You say that, Garry, and I'd not be first in the queue to defend this, or any other government's position...
... But I think the response is good, and the solid points it makes are almost inarguable.
It is correct of them to say that (whatever we might want to infer/assume) that 1) country of provenance and 2) honey authenticity are mutually exclusive... and cannot be conflated (I'm sure there is some fabulous honey that comes out of China).
For large honey packers, the nigh-on impossible challenge of labelling blended honey (where the countries of origin may vary constantly) is discussed, and is the real challenge, it seems
I signed this petition - but the response has given me food for thought.
Is the answer not to change the Honey Regs to mandate that any honey made from blends of honeys from different countries needs to be called "Blended Honey" .... and to mandate (as is currently the case) that all honeys originating from a single country of origin have a named country.
"Honey" thereby being the de-facto premium product, and "Blended Honey" being it's poor cousin (caveat emptor etc...) ?? ...
Just a thought, anyhow, but to slam the response is a kneejerk reaction.