B
Beefriendly
Guest
The over exaggeration is mostly coming from your direction? Constantly? Week in, week out?
Some examples of my constant week in week out over-exaggeration, please? I'd be interested to read some.
The over exaggeration is mostly coming from your direction? Constantly? Week in, week out?
You have never been on the receiving end of his PM's before?? They are not nice to read.
Not a joke to me and rather insensitive of UB if he continues to try to provoke me.
Do you think being called a chronic masturbater on a public forum is in the least bit humerous SDM??? Perhaps you do?
https://beekeepingforum.co.uk/showthread.php?p=626619#post626619
No you don't, you chose to think you did and got it wrong.And certainly a lot funnier than referring to me as a 'thick paddle' (we know what you really meant by that) when I politely challenged your opinion.
.
No you don't, you chose to think you did and got it wrong.
Seems that disenchantment with local mongrels and the likes is increasing.
Can't argue that there are more imports than ever, for whatever reasons.
The main reason for the increase is a tightening up of procedures and thus improved reporting, not a real rise in numbers coming in. Statistics can SEEM to show anything you want them to.
A thick paddle is an mildly offensive rowing term usually dished out to the guy/gal who can't keep up....they must be using a "thick paddle"...or at least it was in my old river Wear sculling club.
If I'd used the word Paddy you would be right to take offence. However if I've inadvertently caused you racist distress by using the term paddle then I unreservedly apologize for choosing a word that you have chosen to imply means something racist towards yourself. Me thinks you badly over-interpreted here.
For all you've learned about bees, you've a lot to learn about the British, were generally a bit less confrontational and plain speaking than some of our northern European cousins we'd call it respectful . No surprise really that you haven't learned that here.
Well said. That COLOSS paper on survival of local vs. non-local stocks was a very questionable study.
I was also intrigued that professional breeders/rearers/researchers were wrong about the stated races of their bees in around 30% of specimens analysed.
We would do well to remember that when a paper is published, it does not become A Fact, but rather it is published for critique, comment, challenge, and replication or contradiction by further studies.
Anyhoo, enough beekeeping content, back to the petty insults and mud-slinging
Some examples of my constant week in week out over-exaggeration, please? I'd be interested to read some.
Suggest you read my post again and notice the question marks. They were questions as in questioning your rant.
I can see that this Thread has descended lower than low, and I thought some useful discussion and gleaning of useful information could be had.
....
Alas I think any thread on this forum that starts with AMM in the title is destined to head this way.
Well I apologise for my part in the lowering...I can only plead defense....
Alas I think any thread on this forum that starts with AMM in the title is destined to head this way.
I do wish people would say what they mean to say, rather than obfuscate the meaning of what they are trying to say. Now I haven't a clue what you were trying to say.
Oh, I think you know exactly what I was saying.
I rest my case about any thread with Amm in the title being destined to be derailed.
Well done Hoppy...1 post later and off you go trolling again (Yawn).
GOAT... Greatest Of All Time.
Alas I think any thread on this forum that starts with AMM in the title is destined to head this way.
Starts out nice but steadily reverts to angry and defensive?
Starts out nice but steadily reverts to angry and defensive?
Enter your email address to join: