To treat or not for varroa

Beekeeping & Apiculture Forum

Help Support Beekeeping & Apiculture Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
A propeller head (also spelled propellor head, and sometimes shortened to 'prop head' or 'prophead') is jargon for someone who is exceptionally, perhaps weirdly bright or knowledgeable, .

Not to be confused with a prop forward who usually staggers around mumbling incoherently and suffers from concussion and an overdose of post-match alcohol.

Dusty.
 
A propeller head (also spelled propellor head, and sometimes shortened to 'prop head' or 'prophead') is jargon for someone who is exceptionally, perhaps weirdly bright or knowledgeable, especially in some technical field. In computers it is a synonym for a computer geek . The term refers to the child's beanie cap that comes with a spinning propeller sticking out of the top.

I pretty much agree with the gist.... although normally rather than particularly bright or knowledgeable the label "propellor head" is normally used to refer to someone with very limited (if not non existent) social skills ie the computer geek that sits in a darkened room with his keyboards and screens and has no social interaction with "real" people.

One of the skills I exploit in my day job is my ability to "translate/interpret" between prophead/techies and "other people"......

The extreme being between them and "consultants" who just spout jargon and trite meaningless "management speak" (aka bullsh*t).

One game propellor heads like to play (they may even venture out into the light to do it) is bullsh*t bingo.... where they tick off "Management Speak" phrases as they occur during meetings.....

You know the sort of stuff... "Blue sky thinking", "Out of the box", "Synergies" etc etc
 
My favourite out of the box, synergystic thinking is when a manager presents a word cloud to help visualise the priorities.
 
My favourite out of the box, synergystic thinking is when a manager presents a word cloud to help visualise the priorities.

Aaaaarrrrrgggghhhhh Kill me!!! KILL ME NOW!!!!!!
 
Quote:
I note though that the issue of two queens is being avoided.

That will be Elizabeth the first and Mary? I thought this was about bees.



So why are you avoiding this one?

Surely it would be a good idea to test these bees out to see if it is genetic or to do the way the bees are managed?

I really am amazed by all this debate as a newcomer. Are there any other parts of Europe or elsewhere where treatment for varroa is not necessary?
 


Surely it would be a good idea to test these bees out to see if it is genetic or to do the way the bees are managed?



My understanding is that it is primarily Chris' way of managing the bees and whether that would meet every beekeepers needs in different locations is a moot point:rolleyes:.
 
My understanding is that it is primarily Chris' way of managing the bees and whether that would meet every beekeepers needs in different locations is a moot point:rolleyes:.

But we don't know that for sure by any means.
 
I like the Donald Rumsfeld bit because in some ways it says everything, you don't know what you don't know and you know even less about what you don't want to know.:D

From many of the posts at different times on this forum there is "evidence" that has been put forward by a number of forum members of feral bee colonies with continuous occupation spanning many years in the UK, 10 years or more I seem to remember in some instances. It would seem equally likely that there are keepers in the UK not treating and no doubt some old unattended occupied hives.

Certainly that is the case in France and I could take people to possibly hundreds of feral colonies with continuous occupation, (it wouldn't take me long to get the locations of perhaps a thousand or more).

How do I know they are continuously occupied?

One way we can be fairly sure is simply when the owner of a property, tree or what ever that has no understanding of bees says every year they all fly away and then come back because they are still there two days later. Then there are the ones that have been the subject of my own observations and studies including abandoned hives.

The point about these colonies is that they are local bees in the broad sense that are not treated, not manipulated and allowed to swarm.

Then there are all the keepers here including myself that don't mess with our bees too much and don't use any treatments.

Then there is the evidence from INRA in France.

Often anyone putting forward such heretical ideas that honey bees can survive with varroa is "rubbished" either directly or by innuendo, especially if they aren't actually members or participants of any given group and can have their views or methods put down in their absence. Fortunately we now live in an age when self proclaimed priests, priestesses and their theologies can be challenged and exposed for what they are.

So yes, it almost certainly is about methods as much as anything and bees that are adapted to local conditions, therefore if someone wishes to conduct their own studies they have all the information they need to do so.

Of course anyone that is seriously interested could come to France and make some studies of their own.

Chris
 
From many of the posts at different times on this forum there is "evidence" that has been put forward by a number of forum members of feral bee colonies with continuous occupation spanning many years in the UK, 10 years or more I seem to remember in some instances.

We're one of those. There have been bees in a neighbour's chimneys for probably 15 years now. Continuous occupation.

We were recently talking to somebody who has had bees in an old Yew tree for as long as they can remember - they live in the property where they grew up.
 
We're one of those. There have been bees in a neighbour's chimneys for probably 15 years now. Continuous occupation.

We were recently talking to somebody who has had bees in an old Yew tree for as long as they can remember - they live in the property where they grew up.


it 1999% sure that a hive cannot live continuously 15 or 5 years in chimney or in another place under pressure of varroa.
If the hive dies, it gets a new swarm very soon.
 
Are you Donald Rumsfeld in disguise??:)

No, but I am a scientist and know how easy it is for our observations to giving rise to incorrect conclusions. That is partly why we get these conflict on this forum.

If bee can be managed without varroa treatment that is great and interesting.
Why that this is only achieved by some people in some places is even more interesting.

But unless we drill down carefully into these findings and I mean carefully with any bickering and I have to be correct menatily then we will not learn as much as we could.

But Chris has chosen again to not answer the question.

Why not give queens to others to see if this really is a management effect?

Also is anybody aware of any other region or places or indeed are then any UK beeks, who can manage there colonies without treating for varroa.
 
"Why not give queens to others to see if this really is a management effect?"

Why not be even more scientific, and try the management techniques using "local mongrels" first? (as I suspect it's nothing to do with the queens, and they may not "transplant" well)
 
?

Also is anybody aware of any other region or places or indeed are then any UK beeks, who can manage there colonies without treating for varroa.

Well of course, there are parts of Scotland which are varroa free.

The last two years I have treated, but my mite falls before and after treatment have been of the order of 1-2 per day. But then I have ants on all my bottom boards and ants remove dead insects and eat them.

So mite fall means nothing.

I am not brave enough # to risk 9 colonies on an experiment of no treatment.

# nor rich enough.
 
it 1999% sure that a hive cannot live continuously 15 or 5 years in chimney or in another place under pressure of varroa.
If the hive dies, it gets a new swarm very soon.

This is not true and there is plenty of evidence to the contrary.

But Chris has chosen again to not answer the question.

Actually I've answered the question fully, it's just not what you require, but I'll reiterate, it isn't just me it's everywhere here and it's been documented by INRA.

Truth is that I don't need to prove anything to anybody, all I'm doing is making sure that all the facts are available rather than the forum and media being dominated by people that either don't know or don't want to know to the detriment of all those that do want to know.

Chris.
 
Well of course, there are parts of Scotland which are varroa free.

I didn't know that, the common view that I have seen put forward is that varroa exists everywhere in mainland Britain where there are honey bees.

Do we know where?

Chris
 

Latest posts

Back
Top