Responded, but when it says 'your bees', it should not necessarily indicate blanket treatment - I treat only as required, so not necassarily all of them.
Plans might be one thing, 'actuality' is another. I don't plan, I monitor and act according to needs, and actually action my decision based on observations, where varroa are concerned. Bee farmers have to plan ahead to get their jobs done, so there is a considerable difference, in attitude to treating and the organisation to carry it out, than for some of us who have just a few colonies.
So I'm a bit with Hivemaker. But let's face it: you can't please all the people all the time. So typical poll without too much thought of the real underlying problem -varroa - which some of us know already is not a simple treat or not treat. Demonstrated with November treatment option. Nobody plans to treat with oxalic acid in November. They may have treated,or should have treated, if mite infestation was at alarming levels. but it would not have been 'planned' (organised in advance). Let's face it, if it had continued with mild weather up to the new year nobody, or very few, would have treated by now. So too much weather dependence to make any sensible conclusions from the data (to extrapolate to future years, for example)
Just my take on it. Good job we are not all the same minded. I'm still with you, Hivemaker
Regards, RAB