Brosville
Queen Bee
I'm somewhat at a loss to understand the reason for any animosity - I am one of those dreadful new guerrilla beekeepers with a top bar hive - I did a great deal of reading before choosing to go with that method, and did so for a great many good reasons, not least the desire to do without chemicals of any sort if at all possible.
Having farmed I am well aware of the undue influence of the agrochemical and pharmaceutical companies, and am of the opinion that the honeybee has done extremely well for millennia without them, and that with good husbandry there is no reason why chemicals can't be minimised, or done without completely. (Any eejit can "farm" chemically, it takes a real farmer to do without)
I'm quite accepting of the fact that I may well be seen as a total loony (with which I can live) - honey production is WAY down the list of priorities for me - it's a nice "bonus" - my aim is to keep healthy bees, and help redress the balance caused by the chemical lunacy of recent years.
I find that some conventional beekeepers tend to be just as blinkered as they accuse top bar hivers of being, and any questioning of the essential rightness of the tablets of stone handed down by Mr Langstroth is met with an outburst of religious fundamentalism of the worst sort.
As for the "it'll spread disease" argument, I think it's utter tosh - us new hobbyists will probably be overdoing inspections, varroa counts etc, and will be the first to seek expert help should something untoward arise. If a source of "over the fence" problems is being sought, I'd suggest bad commercial concerns, lackadaisical "old" beekeepers, and most of all, farmers using toxic chemicals are going to do far more harm.........
I fully recognise the problems in anything of the "ours is the only true way" attitude, for which reason I'm a member here, and the Biobees site too - to my mind, the best way for progress to be made is peaceful co-existence, and exchange of ideas, rather than trench-digging!
Having farmed I am well aware of the undue influence of the agrochemical and pharmaceutical companies, and am of the opinion that the honeybee has done extremely well for millennia without them, and that with good husbandry there is no reason why chemicals can't be minimised, or done without completely. (Any eejit can "farm" chemically, it takes a real farmer to do without)
I'm quite accepting of the fact that I may well be seen as a total loony (with which I can live) - honey production is WAY down the list of priorities for me - it's a nice "bonus" - my aim is to keep healthy bees, and help redress the balance caused by the chemical lunacy of recent years.
I find that some conventional beekeepers tend to be just as blinkered as they accuse top bar hivers of being, and any questioning of the essential rightness of the tablets of stone handed down by Mr Langstroth is met with an outburst of religious fundamentalism of the worst sort.
As for the "it'll spread disease" argument, I think it's utter tosh - us new hobbyists will probably be overdoing inspections, varroa counts etc, and will be the first to seek expert help should something untoward arise. If a source of "over the fence" problems is being sought, I'd suggest bad commercial concerns, lackadaisical "old" beekeepers, and most of all, farmers using toxic chemicals are going to do far more harm.........
I fully recognise the problems in anything of the "ours is the only true way" attitude, for which reason I'm a member here, and the Biobees site too - to my mind, the best way for progress to be made is peaceful co-existence, and exchange of ideas, rather than trench-digging!