bingevader
Field Bee
People have already picked up on most of your comments, but I'd like to highlight this:
This is merely your measure of success as one who keeps bees for honey.
Whilst I have no problem with that, it is not the bees' measure of success.
You are upset with others for suggesting that AMM is better because it originated here, but you are doing the same by suggesting your strain is better because it produces more honey.
Aren't we as bee keepers as guilty as the farmers whose cattle now produce ridiculous volumes of milk or sheep that produce triplets, in suggesting that production is everything?
It might be in your interest, I'm not sure it's in the bees'.
If you mean to imply that Amm is more adapted to the conditions here, I would ask you to show me an Amm colony that performs like this (https://www.beekeepingforum.co.uk/album.php?albumid=751&pictureid=3832). Is this not evidence of being suited to my local conditions? I think it is. My carnica performs better here than any of the local mongrels which, by your argument, should be better adapted.
This is merely your measure of success as one who keeps bees for honey.
Whilst I have no problem with that, it is not the bees' measure of success.
You are upset with others for suggesting that AMM is better because it originated here, but you are doing the same by suggesting your strain is better because it produces more honey.
Aren't we as bee keepers as guilty as the farmers whose cattle now produce ridiculous volumes of milk or sheep that produce triplets, in suggesting that production is everything?
It might be in your interest, I'm not sure it's in the bees'.