VEG
Queen Bee
- Joined
- Nov 10, 2008
- Messages
- 6,822
- Reaction score
- 6
- Location
- Maesteg South Wales
- Hive Type
- National
- Number of Hives
- 15+-some
you are correct but some that have them seem willing to *** someone else with them.
Although not quite the same level, but I do know people who will happily offer 'leftover' antibiotics to other people.I was under the impression you can't administer it to someone if it isn't prescribed to them anyway and that is only in dire emergency and if there is noone qualified able to administer within a sensible time frame. As far as I'm aware it isnt legal to have them in a first aid kit unless you are medically trained to the appropriate level anyway.
but some sort of training should be given and made aware of the stages of AS and at what stage it should be given if an ambulance cant get there on time. Sticking a massive needle in your leg is bloody Painful and for someone to do this to you unnecessarily I think I would kill them. You can't teach common sense you are either born with it or notIt's largely dependent on how much responsibility an individual is expected to assume for their own actions. In Canada, for instance, Epipens are available over the counter of a pharmacy, no prescription, no medical assessment. The individual is responsible for their own actions. As they would be with a knife, chainsaw or driving a vehicle.
Many airlines carry them, as they do other medication, because they may be needed. They would not be administered lightly and ultimately it's better to have something available than not.
If there is a situation where an Epipen would help, there is one to hand and regular paramedic aid is some time away, then I'd trust most responsible adults to make a considered decision. Mostly I'd expect that decision to be right, or at least the balance of decisions to be doing more good than harm. That a small number of cases might be called wrongly would not concern me about having them more freely available.
As a qualified nurse I would use and epi pen on someone if they were carrying it with no qualms.
...
Before we got into the world of litigation this would have been fine, but now I also know that if I do inject a person with adrenaline I may end up facing litigation even if I did save their life.
As a qualified nurse I would use and epi pen on someone if they were carrying it with no qualms.
I am concerned that people may hold off using one for fear of injuring someone.
I believe if you are teaching bee keeping then a basic understanding of anaphylaxis is a necessity, and my belief is also that injecting an epi pen in another unaffected HEALTHY person may make them a bit jittery and increase their heart rate but other wise would do very little harm. I believe it is better to over react that under react.
The difficulty is when you have a person who already has an underlying cardiac condition, BUT again if the choice is between a closed airway, which would cause a quick death, and a paramedic and later hospital sorting out the effects of adrenaline on a live person I know what I would do.
Before we got into the world of litigation this would have been fine, but now I also know that if I do inject a person with adrenaline I may end up facing litigation even if I did save their life.
In Canada, for instance, Epipens are available over the counter of a pharmacy, no prescription, no medical assessment. ..............................
Many airlines carry them, as they do other medication, because they may be needed..
Hi Pete ,
I had a dear friend who was (not once but twice ) torpedoed during WW11!
He , on overhearing some kids at works discussing being atheists ! leaned over to me and quietly said ( In a Lancashire accent of course )" Al tell thi what ! there's no atheists in a lifeboat"
I sincerely hope, that in the unfortunate position of suffering from an unexpected incidence of anaphylaxia , some one has the balls to administer a proven life maintaining auto injection to keep you going until the rescue services arrive !.
Epipen now issue 'twin packs' the second to be deployed if the first doesn't work quickly enough .
In rare individuals, this maybe counter productive !
However , should a person display the classic symptoms of true anyphalaxia, regardless of under lying medical conditions .
The balance of risk must weigh in favour of administration rather simply allowing the victim to die (rather than one having a clear conscience )
IMHO.
VM