OP
Hivemaker.
Queen Bee
Wonder if there is any relationship/input into the questions asked in this one?
No.
Wonder if there is any relationship/input into the questions asked in this one?
That's just utterly false. (the bit about only one side having vested commercial interest) Our breeding project would do VERY well indeed under an import ban...............but I don't want to be forced into a many years project of totally uncertain outcome using bees that are not great to start with just to protect what are...and sorry to be so blunt...largely an amateur's pets.
I would make a lot more money from our breeding project if there was a ban, but conversely make a lot less money if any at all from the honey business...and you can wax lyrical about the black wonder bees all you like...I KNOW them......if forced to use all black bees. I would have considerably less honey for the public. Its part the lower per colony production and partly the increased labour input per colony needed to work with a relatively difficult bee, never mind the more awkward siting needs to keep them further away from the public.
The popularity of well bred bees from abroad is rising, not falling. Witness the hugely enthusiastic response from those who went on the BFA's Danish trip this past week. They are 50 years ahead of us. We are a generally backward beekeeping country, and getting more and more introverted. Last time I looked up my Thesaurus I failed to note the word 'inferior' listed as an alternative for 'foreign'..................yet ONE side of the native/local bee debate uses the words almost as interchangeable. Good bees are good bees, irrespective of origin. Yes there can be regional fluctuations in which bees are best.....but to say only 'local' can do is protectionist nonsense and institutionalises mediocrity.
Interesting that you should paint yourself in the home grown queens camp, is this borne out by the proportion of homegrown to imported queens you deal with?
Thanks for replying, still unclear wether there's more imports to homegrown queens in your own operation but that's your business, apologies if what I wrote came across as a "wilful misportrayal" of what you do, wasn't my intention at all. My original contention that only one side has "significant " vested interest is by no means "utterly false"(perhaps I should have inserted the significant bit originally ) I think it's valid looking at the replies from posters on this thread.
Its only confidential because some of the information would make the identification of recipients fairly straightforward and I would not wish problems onto any of them.
my suspicion is the numbers of queens involved are many many times more of the imports compared to the home produced and therefore interesting that you chose to reply with your "homegrown" hat on,
I can't see how thats possible if he produced 2,500 to 3,000 queens in the UK.
"but there are a number of SINGLE ORDERS out there this year for imported queens exceeding 1000. "
my suspicion is the numbers of queens involved are many many times more of the imports compared to the home produced and therefore interesting that you chose to reply with your "homegrown" hat on,
Some of you are looking pretty rude here. Time to back of maybe?
PH
Don't worry Pete. I can handle myself if I have to.
To the thread in general........
One the subject of single orders for 1000+ queens? Where did I say *I* had received all those?
I do happen to have a lot of trade connections and information is currency in a trade network. There are people out there who might be horrified if they knew that I knew about what they are doing.....
I do not spend a couple of hours each day on email/internet/phone for no good reason.
Sometimes, it amazes me how quickly people can reverse their position on this forum.
Well done!
You've shown humility changing your position on how possible it is for one of the premier importers of queens in the country to import more than they home raise, bravo!
Enter your email address to join: