Chris B, Interesting article, thank you.
It was standing room only (in the corridor!) at the excellent LBKA monthly meeting yesterday, with John Chapple (as quoted in the "Boris - Capital Bee" article) only just inside the room. (Maybe that's why he's in favour of fewer aspiring beeks and more knowledgeable existing beeks !). John's comments raise interesting questions:
New aspiring bee-keepers appear at the LBKA meetings every month, and last year two of my neighbours expressed a wish to keep bees ASAP. The mantra I repeat to all is: "Go on a course - and if you enjoy the course, commit to being mentored, learning more and taking exams". In a densely-populated urban environment, poor knowledge and skills can bring a lot of grief in terms of local bee-health and negative PR. (There were several EFB cases in South East London last year).
I have even begun to sense a chill from some longer-standing Members about forage resources for their existing hives when new apiaries are being conceived. Since availability of forage in cities is so hard to quantify, it is understandable, I suppose. Does anyone have any suggestions for rough-and-ready urban forage/acreage/hive calculations out there?
Even if a consensus on appropriate forage resources/hive could be reached, enforcing a healthy bee environment (ie a new hive exclusion zone around existing apiaries, for example) would be impossible. So I come down on the side of achieving the highest bee health and welfare standards through continuous education by active local associations -and leaving the bees to sort out the forage question themselves.
Any other thoughts on dealing with the upsurge of interest in urban beekeeping for the long term?