Skyhook
Queen Bee
- Joined
- May 19, 2010
- Messages
- 3,053
- Reaction score
- 0
- Location
- Dorset
- Hive Type
- 14x12
- Number of Hives
- 5
Richard Dawkins attacks faith equally aggressively...
There is always a danger in any conflict of both sides using the 'he started it' defence. The only way out is reasoned debate; and unfortunately this is difficult when the 2 sides speak different languages. (continued below)
Now him along with (and I hate to say it Derren Brown) need shooting. Proof is not as a result of the "because I say so defence". He is a complete toilet. I have watched many of his so called serious investigations and i find him just as bad as Anne but on the other end of the scale. I say this He says, so therefore it's fact and I have shown why so there.
Richard Dawkins is an opinionated man-possibly not the only one in the world. This doesn't make him wrong, however. I have watched his programmes and was pleasantly surprised, given his reputation, at how carefully he put his arguments- particularly eg when debating face to face with a creatonist.
It can be very frustrating when putting forward a logical argument, to have it basically sidestepped while your opponent just repeats their opinion.
Interviewers get frustrated when politicians dodge the question and repeat the party line, no reason why Dawkins shouldn't get frustrate in the same situation.