Whatever happened to those NZ bees?

Beekeeping & Apiculture Forum

Help Support Beekeeping & Apiculture Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
I will pass these comments on the bees..

Incredibly quiet, even when queenless. I deliberately tested this and was and am very impressed.

Productive. They did very well under very challenging drought conditions.

Hard to comment on swarminess but even at the point of over crowding, and I am talking seriously over populated nucs, they didn't throw cells.

Bottom line will I buy again? Oh yes. I seem to have lost interest in anything else.

A real delight to work with.


PH
 
Thank you very interesting. They sound like lovely bees to work with I think beekeepers in the uk are too willing to put up with grumpy bees that other countries wouldnt entertain
 
Thanks for the link to the podcast. Will try to give it a listen tomorrow - too tired today!
Now it's time for a glass of wine and feet up.:)
 
Where do I get a few queens from?

I do not sell them on in any number other than bring in large batches that go on to others. Just do not have the time.

However, they ARE retailed out by Peter Kemble at KBS, and Paynes, although I think the latter prefer to supply them in well established nucs. Other than as a favour to a small number of people I do not do retail.

Be absolutey sure to ask for the Carniolan ones, the usual NZ Italian stock are very different, and certainly not suited to my needs.
 
Or try Keld at Buckfast Denmark (Google) for Queens with exceptional qualities not dissimilar to those outlined above.

And our Own Norton's are equally as good too.

That's if you're pro importation.
 
Last edited:
Or try Keld at Buckfast Denmark (Google) for Queens with exceptional qualities not dissimilar to those outlined above.

They are not the same...a bit hungrier..though the temperament is similar. Have had a few Danish strains over, and yes, lovely bees, but the bottom line was more syrup and less honey. ( but considerably better to work with than local mongrels or just about any black bee I have tried)

However...........WAY too expensive for what you get.....I could only afford to use them as breeder queens.
 
Last edited:
Or try Keld at Buckfast Denmark (Google) for Queens with exceptional qualities not dissimilar to those outlined above.

And our Own Norton's are equally as good too.

That's if you're pro importation.

I agree,and the two make a good combination,very productive,and most of mine will need no winter feeding,they have stuffed the brood box's full of ling honey, and seem to know when to switch off when needed.
 
I do not sell them on in any number other than bring in large batches that go on to others. Just do not have the time.

However, they ARE retailed out by Peter Kemble at KBS, and Paynes, although I think the latter prefer to supply them in well established nucs. Other than as a favour to a small number of people I do not do retail.

Be absolutey sure to ask for the Carniolan ones, the usual NZ Italian stock are very different, and certainly not suited to my needs.

Thank you once again
 
They are not the same...a bit hungrier..though the temperament is similar. Have had a few Danish strains over, and yes, lovely bees, but the bottom line was more syrup and less honey. ( but considerably better to work with than local mongrels or just about any black bee I have tried)

However...........WAY too expensive for what you get.....I could only afford to use them as breeder queens.

Can anyone else offer a comparison based on experience? I was brought up to consider the Buckfast the apogee of a good bee, especially as regards temperament: but it sounds as though these give them a run for their money.
 
They are not the same...a bit hungrier..though the temperament is similar. Have had a few Danish strains over, and yes, lovely bees, but the bottom line was more syrup and less honey. ( but considerably better to work with than local mongrels or just about any black bee I have tried)

However...........WAY too expensive for what you get.....I could only afford to use them as breeder queens.



I appreciate your point concerning price, as they are not cheap (particularly the Danish)

However, I cannot agree with your comments relating to overwintering and honey production - one of my Danish imports from last year brooding in a double National hive has filled three National brood box supers and has pretty much supplied itself with stores for winter, pre full-on ivy flow too.

I understand our regional variations though.
 
Last edited:
I've seen Carnies from Hawaii and without exception they were all as good as gold. Their vice was outrageous swarminess - swarming a day or more before first cell sealed, and then a new queen trying to swarm only a few weeks after coming into lay. They needed a firm hand.
My own bees are all Buckfast types. Temper is generally very good too and a lot of them don't swarm. Sometimes they do munch through the syrup as Murray suggests, but not a major issue. I reckon they make up for it in productivity.
 
I appreciate your point concerning price, as they are not cheap (particularly the Danish)

However, I cannot agree with your comments relating to overwintering and honey production - one of my Danish imports from last year brooding in a double National hive has filled three National brood box supers and has pretty much supplied itself with stores for winter, pre full-on ivy flow too.

I understand our regional variations though.

I did not make any observations about the wintering.

However, as you raise the issue, the only actual figures definitely and clearly recorded were for the co-op unit in Scotland last year.....and btw these were started from 2lb packages on nothing but foundation (no brood or anything) in early May. Winter loss was less than 2%, (2 lost from 188 into winter) and those were ones that ran to queenless (probably beekeeper fault). They were given 2 gallons of invert syrup after the season, and less than half took it all, the remainder polishing it off during and after winter.

Even in that situation, with only foundation, many gave the best part of a box of clover before the heather, and from one to four (ave about 2) boxes of pure Ling on the mountains. A box is a full langstroth deep btw, so a lot bigger than a National. Most of them drew out four or five full boxes of foundation in the season.

Overwintered in Aberdeenshire (so harsh) without fault, and with very low stores consumption. Went off like a rocket in the spring and in conditions where our natives were really struggling (most did nil) hauled in a couple of deeps of OSR. Then the weather broke here and we went *13 weeks* with no nectar and no pollen worth speaking about. However these bees are not the swarmy stuff you expect from relatively unselected carniolans (although even the worst were unlike our own. If you want to see swarmy you should see 'iberica' or 'sicula'.)

This years ones down south were started from 1.9lb of bees, again on new gear, and by the time of their heather move they had averaged 1.5 Lang deeps of clover/lime. Heather season been grim generally in home range, but where these bees were put they have done from 1 to 3 full deeps of heather again, like last year. The Aberdeenshire ones went to an area where there has been no flow this year, and all bees alike have done very little indeed at the heather, they had little chance as it did not start to flower there until the last week of August and the weather has been terrible ever since. Even so..........they have done their best and have about double the amount the local bees have dragged in. All deeps in all hives of the kinds of bees we currently have are heavy.

I await the ivy flow in Hereford with some anticipation. Its a thing I have never seen, as we just do not get it at all up here.

One of the things that muddies the waters a bit making comparisons is the tghing in your post 'one of my'...often changed to 'some of my' with others. this is actually interesting, but nothing more, its average that counts. We all have 'one of my' or 'some of my' colonies with remarkable harvests, even in poor years.

Back to the buckfast bee. Every breeders Buckfast is a different beast. I have never hasd even one Buckfast strain that, when trialled up here, was worth giving long term houseroom to. (The only possible exception to this are the near black Buckfasts out of Luxembourg which were very good bees, but failed to breed consistent worthwhile progeny when outcrossing.) The several Danish bees we trialled all did very nicely in spring, and were very easy to work. However they then plateaued and the local bees went past them. Their food requirement was very high, and the only way to kick them out of their mid season lull was with syrup.

The figures given by Denmark about how their bees do bears a lot of close scrutiny and should not be taken at face value. The average syrup input to a hive in Denmark is scary compared to here, and those who are strictly honest about it tell of 40 to 70....even (rarely but have had it said to me) at times up to 100 kilos of syrup into their hives per season. the annual harvest tends not to be very much higher than syrup input. I could have a fabulous harvest every year if I put even 50Kg of syrup into my bees but we run at an average of about 20Kg per annum (14Kg for winter feed, due in part to foundation replacement in the nest previously mentioned, and only about 50% of the hives need a further feed in spring.) you can tell how they work when one of the original marketing strands for Ambrosia was 'its not detectable in honey, so use this and really start to make money'. (Not true btw, its easily detectable and always has been, just that the tests to look for it were not done in Denmark but are sometimes done here.) On top of the syrup input they also need fondant through dearths to keep the bees going.

Your 'one of' statement about your Danish bees is, in itself, unremarkable, however if your average is anywhere approaching that then you have good stock there that bears further scrutiny.
 
Just forgot to add this.

Andrew Scobbie snr, who will be known to some, is one of Scotlands most respected and competent beekeepers, and just about Scotlands best honey getter.

He has trialled all these bees, and paid a lot of money for Danish Buckfast queens. He has nothing to gain from making an observation, and he describes the NZ carniolans as 'the best he has ever seen'.

All of course under the understanding that the original Buckfast is not a bee well adapted to Scottish conditions, and that all Buckfasts vary, even from the same breeder.
 
All good points and I'm not disputing. Useful information too.

I will probably average between 58-62lbs from my hives this year, which given the weather and the fact that I'm not what you might call 'commercial', I shall be pleased with. Not all of my colonies are headed by Buckfast either.

Yours appear truly to be a 'super bee'...
 
I will probably average between 58-62lbs from my hives this year, which given the weather and the fact that I'm not what you might call 'commercial', I shall be pleased with. Not all of my colonies are headed by Buckfast either.

Yours appear truly to be a 'super bee'...

Pretty fair crop for 2011...wish I had that overall. Will not even sniff it.

However.........a GOOD amateur beekeeper should beat a proper professional every time. Several reasons but most of all the time and love and devotion they can dedicate to each hive. There is definitely a law of diminishing returns as you scale up and start to play the percentages game.

The very best and the very worst are in the amateur sector.......bad commercial beekeepers tend to suffer from 'natural cull' if they are not up to the job.
 
Can anyone else offer a comparison based on experience? I was brought up to consider the Buckfast the apogee of a good bee, especially as regards temperament: but it sounds as though these give them a run for their money.

I knew there was something wrong with that as i posted it- I meant apotheosis. Notwithstanding, some really useful comments, and food for thought.
 
Average of 80lbs per colony for 2011 on 30 honey producers and and nearly all have enough left on for over Wintering (25 out of 30).
All using Nortons queens or descendants of.

Peter
 
Yours appear truly to be a 'super bee'...


I've struggled to read through several books and articles on bee genetics and though my understanding is limited one principle which seems to come up time and again is inbreeding supression and the loss of sex alleles from a population.
How long can these 'super bee' remain so when they originate from highly selected, island mated carnies from Germany, exported to NZ and then subjected to further rigourous selection and culling ? Surely the gene pool of these bees is getting narrower and narrower ? Or is preserving sex alleles in a population overrated ? Or is it that these bee breeders are being extremely dilligent in preserving umpteen lines presumably by AI ?
Either way, to my mind it seems more sustainable in the long run to have a native population of bees capable of doing well under natural mating conditions.

P.S. average crop <30 - 35>
 
Last edited:
How can you be sure that a strain of bees is native? Maybe you mean imported AMM and its mongrels. Anyway just because it is native or near-native does not necessarily mean that it is the best bee from a beekeeping point of view. They might be aggressive, produce small colonies and crops and are just great survivors, nothing more.

The Germans shifted from AMM type of bees to Carnica and Buckfast decades ago. The Israelis use only Buckfast or Italians in place of the very aggressive A. m. syriaca. AMM has been largely replaced in Scandinavia by other ssp/strains.

The Buckfast breeding program has been going for over 90 years now and is still going strong. AI and mating stations play an important role in the continuing good results. The diversity enables crossing within the strain to be made at will to enhance whatever characteristic is desired. If you mate Buckfast to Buckfast they breed true and you get Buckfast. Don't believe this rubbish rumour going around that they don't. It has been spread by some idiots who don't know what they are talking about and have a separate agenda.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top