Julie, with all due respect I'm being drawn down the path of defending the product which I have no wish to do on this forum. I'm not promoting or trying to convince you to buy the product. I'm happy to give advice on a take it or leave it basis on the wider issue of integrated wasp management which includes making beekeepers aware of the perils of certain actions that increase risk to their hives.
I will however rise to the challenge of independent peer review by universities. It is purely a matter of principle that I have actively chosen not to seek endorsement by universities and if it hurts my product I frankly don't care. Why? Because I have no wish to prostitute myself to an institution that will do my bidding for money. And I talk here from wider experience. Contrary to what some have said on here I'm not just a snake skin oil seller. It's good that your step son has taught you forensic skills in decision making but that only works if you have access to all the necessary information. The truth is that universities publish only a fraction of their research (circa 18%) and hide the rest that isn't flattering either to their reputation or their intention. Furthermore, they operate an unhealthy monopoly on information that not only actively seeks to usurp and monopolise intellectual property but also sees Chancellors earn close on £500k per annum whilst sucking the life blood out of our youth at £9000 per annum all the while denying those students access to the high class research facilities that their fees entitle them to.
Don't get me wrong. My professional career has been rooted in scientific research which has had oversight by independent regulatory bodies and the most important independent critics - real customers. I'm a firm believer that proof comes with the eating. Would you prefer to have an endorsement from a university that has been paid for the endorsement or from a customer who has no agenda other than to be truly satisfied?