Rosti
Drone Bee
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2009
- Messages
- 1,755
- Reaction score
- 14
- Location
- North Yorks, UK
- Hive Type
- 14x12
- Number of Hives
- 4
Went along to the screening in York tonight.
Positives:
Italian meal pre-flicks was very nice
Pironi nicely chilled
sorry ....
Good turnout 1/2 full cinema, perhaps 125 people.
40 mins debate session afterwards
Reps from Co-op and Bug Life (charity) present
Started to get some useful points come through on life cycle pesticide impact
NeoNic sub lethal impact high lighted, studies on sun flowers quoted
Varroa, nosemia, viruses regarded as secondary contributor
Showed impact of more direct political approaches in France and Germany (more detail than the BBC prog)
Negatives
A very high proportion of the footage seemed to be very similar to the 'who killed the honey bee' material.
Very little UK footage and UK impact/context information
Disappointments
BugLife reps not that well informed - broad spectrum charity so understandable?
Given CSL are based at York it was disappointing they could not rustle up a speaker for the debate (they were invited)
Suprises
BugLife not fully supportive of an expanding beek base (or these speakers weren't anyway) - because the HBs could out compete other natural pollinators but they want more natural 'meadows' planted. Didn't dispute the comment so as not to de-rail the evening but it occurs to me ...
Want more meadows, meadows need pollination, natural pollinators in steep decline, HBs pollinate meadow plants, habitat established and re-expanded, natural pollinators can recover population, 70% of foods require pollination, beeks a self funding (free) national resource for food production and flora diversity / protection. Why wouldn't BugLife be in favour?
No real comments on how / when / whether government are planning to impose full insect life cycle, standard blue print pesticide evaluation models on the chemical industry or even if this is being considered? If the chemical producers complete and fund the approval testing then surely there must atleast be an independently imposed scope and SOP in place to allow peer review and impact comparison?
Oh and breaking news ... Bayer were invited to participate but chose not to!
Positives:
Italian meal pre-flicks was very nice
Pironi nicely chilled
sorry ....
Good turnout 1/2 full cinema, perhaps 125 people.
40 mins debate session afterwards
Reps from Co-op and Bug Life (charity) present
Started to get some useful points come through on life cycle pesticide impact
NeoNic sub lethal impact high lighted, studies on sun flowers quoted
Varroa, nosemia, viruses regarded as secondary contributor
Showed impact of more direct political approaches in France and Germany (more detail than the BBC prog)
Negatives
A very high proportion of the footage seemed to be very similar to the 'who killed the honey bee' material.
Very little UK footage and UK impact/context information
Disappointments
BugLife reps not that well informed - broad spectrum charity so understandable?
Given CSL are based at York it was disappointing they could not rustle up a speaker for the debate (they were invited)
Suprises
BugLife not fully supportive of an expanding beek base (or these speakers weren't anyway) - because the HBs could out compete other natural pollinators but they want more natural 'meadows' planted. Didn't dispute the comment so as not to de-rail the evening but it occurs to me ...
Want more meadows, meadows need pollination, natural pollinators in steep decline, HBs pollinate meadow plants, habitat established and re-expanded, natural pollinators can recover population, 70% of foods require pollination, beeks a self funding (free) national resource for food production and flora diversity / protection. Why wouldn't BugLife be in favour?
No real comments on how / when / whether government are planning to impose full insect life cycle, standard blue print pesticide evaluation models on the chemical industry or even if this is being considered? If the chemical producers complete and fund the approval testing then surely there must atleast be an independently imposed scope and SOP in place to allow peer review and impact comparison?
Oh and breaking news ... Bayer were invited to participate but chose not to!
Last edited: