The varroa solution

Beekeeping & Apiculture Forum

Help Support Beekeeping & Apiculture Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Transference is generally minor, so any characteristics in the colony mites tend to dominate once established - especially if the bees are pushing them in that direction.

I don't know how much what I will say here will be supported - its one of those things that seems bleddy obvious to me once the first part (as explained by Steve Riley is in place).

As I understand it, if (VHS, or similar traits) bees detect mites in brood cells and uncapping occurs, they interfere with mite reproduction.

The bees seem to uncap more frequently in cases where there are many young mites inside the cell.

This behavior suppresses the strains of mites that tend to have large families, while leaving strains with smaller families relatively unaffected.

(Note: Family size is an inheritable trait.)

Over time, this pressure results in a mite population dominated by strains that produce only one or two offspring per cycle—levels the bees can manage.

The real problem arises when strains of mites that produce four or six offspring per cycle become prevalent. These strains multiply exponentially, leading to a so-called 'mite explosion' that overwhelms the bees.

I think you'll find that much in Steve Riley and the scientific work.

In effect (in my words now), the bees are selectively breeding low-fertility (or low-fecundity) mites, which they can keep under control.
That is interesting, if the bees really uncap cells with more mites then it makes sense, I can't help being sceptical it's been demonstrated (though may well be the case).
I also read a paper where the adult bees were prevented from uncapping etc (caged brood) and resistant strains had a higher proportion of infertile mites in the cells - ie there is a difference in the brood too.
 
It doesn't really matter whether it's a causal effect created by the bees selectively culling mites as a result of evolution or learned behaviour by the bees - the fact that the mites remaining are changed and become less fecund is the critical outcome. Plus, if there are fewer mites in colonies the bees VSH has a greater impact. Win win as far as I can see.
It may matter in that different mechanisms may respond differently to human encouragement measures.
 
Still seems to be a change in the bees rather than the mites from what I've read, now in several papers.
I think this sort of co-evolution (seen in all predator-prey relations) has to be viewed as a change in both.
 
That is interesting, if the bees really uncap cells with more mites then it makes sense, I can't help being sceptical it's been demonstrated (though may well be the case).
I also read a paper where the adult bees were prevented from uncapping etc (caged brood) and resistant strains had a higher proportion of infertile mites in the cells - ie there is a difference in the brood too.
That sounds familiar - will you let us know if you find anything?

For the moment I'm going to go on thinking that is probably another mechanism. It seems there are several, and evolution rotates and tries different combinations. What works to enable bees to gather more energy and produce more viable offspring changes about, as bees and mites do their 'arms race' dance.
 
That's certainly the norm eventually
I don't think there really is an 'eventually'. Any pressure forces change, immediately. That just goes on. Relief of the pressure will also cause change, the retreat of the necessary genes in the population.
 
Still seems to be a change in the bees rather than the mites from what I've read, now in several papers.
Yes. The bees' behaviour is selecting for less fertile mites, leaving a background level the bees can tolerate or manage. Perhaps something like this goes some way to explaining why Phillip sometimes gets peaks of infestation as a result of new mites entering the colony from outside?
 
Interestingly if the bees manage to restrict mites to a single foundress female in a cell then they will slow mite evolution/adaptation as the immature mites will only be able to mate with brothers rather than a less closely related male from a different female.
 
Interestingly if the bees manage to restrict mites to a single foundress female in a cell then they will slow mite evolution/adaptation as the immature mites will only be able to mate with brothers rather than a less closely related male from a different female.
If so this might be seen as further adaptation, another tool on the path to reducing mites to a minor nuisance and on to completely eliminating them.
 
Back
Top