Only in his is final sentence does he get onto the subject of varroa-tolerance; I suspect that this is the teaser for a future blog posting.
Possibly. We'll have to wait and see (and hope somebody brings it to our attention).
That is: if we are interested.
The thing I'm interested in is an explanation for my own experience. As I've said before: I follow John Kefuss' guidance: "it doesn't matter that you know _how_ it works. It matters that you know _that_ it works. I've done it: so I know it has worked for me, marvellously and in gold-plated form.
David Evans as a virologist will be very familiar with the mechanisms by which viruses adapt to circumvent obstacles. He will I expect be familar with the mechanisms by which populations adapt to tolerate viruses. I would expect him to know both that it reliably happens, and a good deal about why that is so.
What I hope is that we can have a discussion about the ways _all_ populations adapt to life forms that predate on them. In particular the way honeybees given the opportunity adapt to the presence of varroa, as many scientific studies by dedicated researchers have shown they do.
And as simple Darwinism predicts they would.
I know not everyone finds this proposition easy. But I doubt a virologist will find it hard.
What I'm really interested in is his views on the constraints that might prevent that scientifically anticipated result. (We can gain a view from Seeley et al here:
Wild/Feral Survivor-Thrivers: Naturally Selected Resistant Bees. )
I won't pick at what I think was a rushed paper intended for a pretty scientifically illiterate audience any more. Lets get on with the interesting stuff: how do we help it happen, how do we stop it happening.
And how do we help those beekeepers who struggle with the notion but want to help with the project of freeing wild bees from the pain of endless fatal ongoing varroa infection.