P, I can guarantee no one will be anywhere near he aggressive hive I'm wanting. Its a very isolated spot where I'm wanting to keep it.
I am surprised at peoples patience with Irishguy. He just simply does not seem to listen (or at least listen properly and process the info).
I hope you don't go ahead with this.
I would also hope you wouldn't let your children go anywhere near an aggressive colony. There's no guarantee that even the most expensive suit will protect from bees that are determined to attack.
Does anyone else keep thinking we have here a future winner of the Darwin Awards?
http://www.darwinawards.com
Dusty
I for one don't think aggressive bees are either better honey collectors or more able to deal with Varroa. Sure some aggressive colonies have collected lots of honey. I've experienced that but also have experienced the same with gentler strains. As for Varroa aggressive bees are no better at dealing with Varroa than gentler strains. I am going back to 1997 when I first got hit by Varroa and believe me the mite did not discriminate nor was it better dealt with by aggressive hives. It killed all just the same. I have no reason whatsoever to believe anything has changed.
Give the girl a break - I think reading it the once was painful enough.can you please do me and yourself a favour and re-read this thread, read every single post ......
Give the girl a break - I think reading it the once was painful enough.
You just don't get it do you ? Regardless of what YOU think and YOU want it's just totally irresponsible on a load of levels.
The worst thing is introducing aggressive genes (as a result of the drones the hive WILL produce) into the beekeeping area. Unless, of course, you have the only bees in about a 10 mile radius with no chance of feral bees in the area as well.
Start thinking about sensible and responsible beekeeping and forget the stupid ideas. For sure there are some people who 'believe' aggressive colonies are better honey producers but they are in the minority and I've never seen any real evidence that aggressive colonies handle varroa better ... bit of bunkum IMO.
Well what I've been reading on the internet suggests different.
O I'm listening alright and I'm taking all information in from this thread and if you read it all again, you'll see there's some in here that backs up what I thought about aggressive bees, they are better at keeping varroa mite away and produce more honey. IMO, (and this is limited to being a beginner beek) man has a lot to answer for for dumbing down bees and has a major part to play in the varroa mite problem in bees. Think about if all aggressive males where culled from mankind and we were left and only the femine type where aloud to flourish, we'd be truely in **** creek then. Same for the bees IMO! People have to start thinking outside the box if they truely want bees to survive and be mite free.
All I'm wanting to do is keep one (or2) hives well away from humans to see for myself how they get on. I have a high fear tollerence and can deal with them, if I think in anyway the bees aren't for me, sure I'll just requeen or destroy the colony and no harm done to anyone.
TBH, I can't see much problems with keeping aggressive bees. Its in their nature to be aggressive and I want at least one aggressive hive. Is it against the law to keep aggressive bees, No!
Is it in mans best interests to keep bees, maybe not.
Is it in the bees best interests for us to keep aggressive bees, well with them being better honey producers and better at keeping varroa away well IMO for now it is!.
Pargyle, how can you say that when you beeks don't give the aggressive hive a chance. Yous cull the Queen not long after knowing the hives aggressive.
Enter your email address to join: