- Joined
- Jan 18, 2021
- Messages
- 2,306
- Reaction score
- 2,179
My intention is not to start another debate about whether or not we should or need to treat our bees; nor do I think it's worthwhile to debate which treatment is actually the best. But I have some questions about treatment.
Last year I didn't treat for varroa and the bees didn't seem any the worse for that. This year I've been persuaded that treating them might be the wiser move. But now I'm getting some mixed messages about how to approach treatments and what chemicals to use.
One of the confusions is regarding the importance of knowing each colony's mite load before treating. This is contradicted by the fact that apparently, all colonies have mites and that if you treat one of your colonies you also need to treat the others in order to avoid re-infestation. So what's the point of assessing them first? Shouldn't we just treat?
The choice of mite treatments seems reasonably straightforward, as a shadow of one type or another hangs over most of the chemicals. So I've found it easy to choose the one which best suits me. But I have come full circle when I read one of the most knowledgeable and experienced (did I also say "respected"? ) contributors here referring to the product as "foul". I'm taken back to my original thoughts about good reasons for not treating and find my head banging on the wall again.
Are we heading towards a situation where the consensus is going to be that we should use oxalic acid vaping and that method alone?
Last year I didn't treat for varroa and the bees didn't seem any the worse for that. This year I've been persuaded that treating them might be the wiser move. But now I'm getting some mixed messages about how to approach treatments and what chemicals to use.
One of the confusions is regarding the importance of knowing each colony's mite load before treating. This is contradicted by the fact that apparently, all colonies have mites and that if you treat one of your colonies you also need to treat the others in order to avoid re-infestation. So what's the point of assessing them first? Shouldn't we just treat?
The choice of mite treatments seems reasonably straightforward, as a shadow of one type or another hangs over most of the chemicals. So I've found it easy to choose the one which best suits me. But I have come full circle when I read one of the most knowledgeable and experienced (did I also say "respected"? ) contributors here referring to the product as "foul". I'm taken back to my original thoughts about good reasons for not treating and find my head banging on the wall again.
Are we heading towards a situation where the consensus is going to be that we should use oxalic acid vaping and that method alone?