BeeJayBee
Queen Bee
Some people like to study and like to take exams. They don't do it to make them "feel adequate", it's simply because the opportunity is there and, well, it's what they want to do.It's all the other bits of paper that don't tell you anything apart from you can sit in an examination room and write legibly that on the whole are pretty silly but if that what makes some people feel adequate, fair enough.
There are plenty who do not want to do any formal study, and do not want to take any written exams - just because they don't.
I don't think it's fair to demean either, or to say that one is more right than the other.
I tend to agree with you, and I also tend to think the Basic is just about right as it stands but there could do with being a next level of practical and oral assessment that isn't as tough, or as subjective, as the GH.The discussion is about what can be done about the current problem of poor beekeeping practice, example noted in the OP. Maybe the answer is nothing, and it's just part of beekeeping?
Whilst a don't think making the BBKA Basic compulsory is a good idea, I think a case can be made for some process to prove practical competency.
There's the conundrum, with all the examples I gave.What do you think killed these bees?
Not what. More like Who?
Is the colony loss the fault of beekeeper of less than a year's experience - who did as they were advised and lost their very expensive bees, or is it the fault of their advisor?