BRAVO!!! REjoice ye angeals in the heavens! You got it! You actually agree that harvesting is ok when there is a surplus, and only then!! WELL DONE. ...
Dear sustainable beekeeper, I am really out of this discussion now but make an exception for you, just to tell you that my otherwise perfect equanmity occasionally fails me under severe provocation. I will strive for more enlightenment in this regard and hope that my privileged life in soft fluffy bee wonderland will assist me in this endeavour.And that's not patronising?
Use of the word rubbish when it was such an issue before?
Discussion on thin straw basket versus timber?
Comment on why you assume that skeps can't have their combs inspected?
Discussion as to why you feel clipping wings is an issue...as there is no moral or ethical one, rather an aesthetic issue (which may indeed be valid)?
And that's not patronising?
Use of the word rubbish when it was such an issue before?
Discussion on thin straw basket versus timber?
Comment on why you assume that skeps can't have their combs inspected?
Discussion as to why you feel clipping wings is an issue...as there is no moral or ethical one, rather an aesthetic issue (which may indeed be valid)?
Of course not, and I never asserted otherwise. Most people care for their bees, I am perfectly aware of that.But Heidi - who doesn't!? It really isn't just people who call themselves 'natural beekeepers' who care for their bees.
Kitta
I do not feel like commenting on the relative aesthetics of queen bee mutilation at this moment but am sure that the practioners of such will be able to throw more light on that.
I feel very satisfied that some, or at least one of my interlocutors today has confirmed that harvesting honey is absolutely fine when the colony concerned has made a surplus.
When this progressive notion is adopted widely in the beekeeping community, autumn sugar sales should fall significantly.
Again with the emotive language Heidi. "Mutilation" - not a loaded term at all is it?!
And I hate to break it to you but most beekeepers harvest a surplus. What else would they harvest? Do you seriously think we're all out there extracting brood frames?
I do not feel like commenting on the relative aesthetics of queen bee mutilation
If that was the generally accepted guiding principle in "harvesting" there would be sugar feeding only in exceptionally bad years.
So you have at last grasped the fact that we dont take every drop of honey. Will you be telling your students that as opposed to making the insinuation that we do take it all?So let's define surplus: above and beqond what the colony is likely to require to sustain itself until spring of the following year.
if your methods of beekeeping are as natural as nature intend, then in an exceptionally bad year the bees would die,, because you wouldnt feed them.
One sadly wonders how misinformed she really may be and therefore just what sort of "tuition" she is giving her bees in a basket scholars.
OK, since we're on the subject of thermal properties - How about comparing straw to two inches of polystyrene?
As you are so well read and freely quote Tom Seely's excellent work on average beehive dimensions from his work on feral colonies living in trees, you will be completely au-fait with the thermal properties of colonies living inside a cavity surrounded by 6-9 inches of solid Oak or Cedar.
Temperatures and humidity levels properly modelled by a highly qualified physicist I know show that these conditions make it very difficult for fungal infections and gets pretty close to the max temperature that Varroa can tolerate. But of course you would know this and realise that the best way of truly replicating a wild colonies natural environment would be a vertically orientated hive made with walls of 2-3 inches of Polystyrene as 6-9 inches of wood is rather impractical - But don't let me stop you...
A super-insulated hive offers a rather interesting way of assisting bees to live in as natural environment as possible and is one area that we think justifies further investigation - But of course this bee-friendly approach is based on real science, so will be utterly ignored by those beekeepers trying to push their own agenda with the media rather than doing the best they can for their bees with an open mind....
Can it be used with frames only
Thank you, a very interesting point. I am not sure whether you are right in assuming that it will be utterly ignored, no need for such pessimism, certainly worth thinking about; I shall be interested to learn more about how colonies fare in those. I have not got one myself, and might consider one if I found a way of concealing it within a more attractive looking structure, a consideration which might strike you as supercilious but is reasonably important to me. Do the bees propolise the interior? Is the entire hive made of polypropylene? Can it be used with frames only, without the use of foundatiion? Having read some scientific evidence of the contamination found in foundation I prefer not to use it). I look forward to hearing more, and thank you for attesting well-readness to me, very kind, but Seeley's Honeybee Democracy is surely a classic that most beekeepers will be aware of. Non-beekeepers, too - it was reviewed in the TLS. Remarkable, isn't it.
Is 'bees in a basket' the alternative to 'course in a case'?
So is chicken in a basket a type of 'natural' poultry farming
You could use the wax your bees produce and make strips to fit into the frames, or do cut outs from your other hives. This could be an additional training course for you to consider.
Enter your email address to join: