- Joined
- Mar 4, 2011
- Messages
- 2,725
- Reaction score
- 1,507
- Location
- Various
- Hive Type
- Smith
- Number of Hives
- >4000
If they use the war year figures and these of the years immediately after..............then the whole thing is hopelessly flawed.
If you had bees you told them how many you had and got a sugar ration for feeding them in return..............so quite a lot of people had quite a lot of hives (of COURSE they did, we're British and honest!). Once the sugar ration came off and there was no longer any advantage the official count dropped by over 100,000 hives..................wonder where the 'sudden number drop' theorists would take that one???
People are drawing the start line at whatever position suits their argument, ditto for the current position...............if you are trying to demonstrate collapse you use post war figures and compare it with numbers around or shortly after the millenium........if trying to show the opposite you use figures from the latter years of the last century and compare it with best estimates of the numbers today.
Beekeeping, and kept hive numbers, are currently on a strong rebound. How long that will last is another matter altogether.
Wild colonies are very rare compared to in the past, a perfectly normal response to the ravages of uncontrolled varroa. Some recovery in these numbers does seem to be underway, although this may largely be due to increased numbers of escaping swarms from the hives of the increased number of less experienced beekeepers re-occupying the feral vacancies. ( I appreciate that is a slight slur on the inexperienced, and a tad unfair, as many of them are cautious and will make excellent beekeepers, and that some more experienced are blase about it or even encourage swarming as it is 'natural'.)
If you had bees you told them how many you had and got a sugar ration for feeding them in return..............so quite a lot of people had quite a lot of hives (of COURSE they did, we're British and honest!). Once the sugar ration came off and there was no longer any advantage the official count dropped by over 100,000 hives..................wonder where the 'sudden number drop' theorists would take that one???
People are drawing the start line at whatever position suits their argument, ditto for the current position...............if you are trying to demonstrate collapse you use post war figures and compare it with numbers around or shortly after the millenium........if trying to show the opposite you use figures from the latter years of the last century and compare it with best estimates of the numbers today.
Beekeeping, and kept hive numbers, are currently on a strong rebound. How long that will last is another matter altogether.
Wild colonies are very rare compared to in the past, a perfectly normal response to the ravages of uncontrolled varroa. Some recovery in these numbers does seem to be underway, although this may largely be due to increased numbers of escaping swarms from the hives of the increased number of less experienced beekeepers re-occupying the feral vacancies. ( I appreciate that is a slight slur on the inexperienced, and a tad unfair, as many of them are cautious and will make excellent beekeepers, and that some more experienced are blase about it or even encourage swarming as it is 'natural'.)