We've been here before !
I think you over dramatise a tad
As stated previously .'If a person is dying before your eyes and medical help is too far away ,then the use of the epipen is the persons only hope of a stay of execution . The risk factor is of little consequence to a dying man!'
If the use of an epipen was more likely to kill than to buy the time it was designed for I think the courts would be working shift work to clear the backlog of compensation cases
I could be as silly as you by advising people not to scale a wall to escape an inferno as there was a strong possibility that he/she may bark his/her shins and indeed is more likely to break their neck clearing the wall than to escape death by combustion .
Reasoned action will help. dodging the column certainly wont!
VM