REDWOOD
Queen Bee
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2009
- Messages
- 8,381
- Reaction score
- 93
- Location
- swansea south wales
- Hive Type
- 14x12
- Number of Hives
- 10
I'm thinking of buying a Bresser Biolux NV with 20x -1280x Magnification are they any good
I'm thinking of buying a Bresser Biolux NV with 20x -1280x Magnification are they any good
First off: you won't get X1280 magnification with these lenses with any degree of definition. It is really a toy and not suited for serious work as the field of view is too small.I'm thinking of buying a Bresser Biolux NV with 20x -1280x Magnification are they any good
Ha lucky I was out bid on ebay then so what would you suggest as a budget good quality used or new scope
I have one of these
http://www.celestron.com/science_education/lcd-digital-microscope.html
If you want to pay for insured postage both ways I'll lend it to you for a month if you want.
Discontinued according to website.
Ha lucky I was out bid on ebay then so what would you suggest as a budget good quality used or new scope
The field of view is far too small to examine slide for nosema if the infection level is low if the slide is covered in spores then you will see them with this.If its still less than £50 this December in Lidl, it'll still be a bargain for Nosema testing.
Even if the extra USB video eyepiece is low res, its in for nothing.
I just wish that there was an easily-available and equivalently priced stereo/dissection microscope ...
The field of view is far too small to examine slide for nosema if the infection level is low if the slide is covered in spores then you will see them with this.
... It is really a toy and not suited for serious work as the field of view is too small.
The Lidl Bresser job has a mechanical table so ... if the field of view is small can you just move the slide across and/or up on the table using the controls to see a larger sample... ?
Well I would be worried about buying a beginning microscope in the first place. It won't be long before the disadvantages of such a microscope come apparent. That said my first (adult) microscope cost 100 punt; it was mococular, X4, X10, X40 objectives and I got X10 and X15 eyepieces. There was no mechanical stage and the condensor was a fixed lens, condenser aperture was a series of cut our holes on a rotating disk. I could do nosema and pollen ,and aging sea trout by reading their scales with this, and your hands learn to cope with no mechanical stage. After a session at Gormanston, I found the ease of binocular vision sunverted me and I went as expensive as I could afford in buying a brunell microscope. As everyone knows one also needs a stereo microscope but I went as cheaply on this as the magnification required was not high. That said new lenses were got for this so I could reach X80 if I required.So, how little money do you think one might be able to get away with, for a beekeeper's beginning microscope?
Well I would be worried about buying a beginning microscope in the first place. It won't be long before the disadvantages of such a microscope come apparent. That said my first (adult) microscope cost 100 punt; it was mococular, X4, X10, X40 objectives and I got X10 and X15 eyepieces. There was no mechanical stage and the condensor was a fixed lens, condenser aperture was a series of cut our holes on a rotating disk. I could do nosema and pollen ,and aging sea trout by reading their scales with this, and your hands learn to cope with no mechanical stage. After a session at Gormanston, I found the ease of binocular vision sunverted me and I went as expensive as I could afford in buying a brunell microscope. As everyone knows one also needs a stereo microscope but I went as cheaply on this as the magnification required was not high. That said new lenses were got for this so I could reach X80 if I required.
Then for teaching purposes a quad-ocular compound microscope was obtained.