MartinL
Queen Bee
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2011
- Messages
- 2,328
- Reaction score
- 3
- Location
- Warwickshire
- Hive Type
- 14x12
- Number of Hives
- 9
My Bucky is from Exmoor, which is pretty damn local, . . !
But not Dartmoor?
Nobody has mentioned Cordovans yet?
My Bucky is from Exmoor, which is pretty damn local, . . !
What else are they going to call it? It's only a marketing term anyway. There is no such thing as a pure "Buckfast" because it is a synthetic strain made from many different races. It's like saying "tartan paint". There is no such thing.
The breeder queen is Buckfast inseminated with Buckfast sperm, so her duaghter queens can only be Buckfast. So the breeder is selling you a "pure" Buckfast queen...The term they uses is open mated.
Like any purchase of livestock there is considerable variation between breeders as to the quality of their queens, which unfortunately (or fortunately) can only be found out after purchase.
Bit of semantics going on here. Buckfast is a breed like dog breeds, , , , ,
This would suggest that a ligusta, carnica, AND buckfast can be counted as a breed and therefore have F1 hybrids.
My understanding is there are 'natural' breeds - ligustica, carnica, etc - and 'established' breeds - buckfast. But they are all breeds.
"Breeds are formed through genetic isolation and either natural adaptation to the environment or selective breeding, or a combination of the two. Despite the centrality of the idea of "breeds" to animal husbandry and agriculture, no single, scientifically accepted definition of the term exists. A breed is therefore not an objective or biologically verifiable classification but is instead a term of art amongst groups of breeders who share a consensus around what qualities make some members of a given species members of a nameable subset."
This would suggest that a ligusta, carnica, AND buckfast can be counted as a breed and therefore have F1 hybrids.
Like dogs from wolves they have been selected to create 'pure breeds' albeit constructed/selected breeds.
Now when it comes to 'knowing what you're getting' - I find the respectable breeders make it quite clear that a queen is open mated or an F1 - and the price clearly demonstrates that - since 'pure' breeder queens cost closer to £300 whereas their open mated daughters cost 1/10th of that.
My understanding is there are 'natural' breeds - ligustica, carnica, etc - and 'established' breeds - buckfast. But they are all breeds.
This is why I said buckfast breed and the rest is semantics
.
This is melting my brain a little. I'm still keen to experience a great variety of bees in my apiary though. Whatever flavour they are.
For the taxonomy to be correct, Buckfasts would have to be a subset of a race e.g. A.m.c.buckfast or A.m.l.buckfast, etc, but, the argument being presented is that Buckfast is on the same level as carnica, ligustica, etc which, clearly is wrong.
There is no morphological or genetic test that I am aware of that, given a sample of bees, would identify it as Buckfast. How could it? Buckfasts are a combination many times removed (not even an F1 cross).
...true mongrel street dog in the developing world where they start to look a bit like wild dogs.
I call them Heinz 57s
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
I'd call them the 'Wolf Bee'.
As it's important that it sounds cool
For the taxonomy to be correct, Buckfasts would have to be a subset of a race e.g. A.m.c.buckfast or A.m.l.buckfast, etc, but, the argument being presented is that Buckfast is on the same level as carnica, ligustica, etc which, clearly is wrong.
There is no morphological or genetic test that I am aware of that, given a sample of bees, would identify it as Buckfast. How could it? Buckfasts are a combination many times removed (not even an F1 cross).
I choose my Buckfast queens from breeders who follow the methods Brother Adam used and can provide pedigrees to show, not had too many problems doing so.
My black bees came from a recognised breeder but without any sort of documentation, luckily they seem okay
S
Enter your email address to join: