Nellie
Field Bee
what i was saying is that being examined in the material DOESN"T help with your beekeeping. Reading, taking in and understanding wide range of information DOES.
In some respects, that's a fair enough point. The exam itself arguably doesn't matter, it's a bit of paper to wave at people. But People seem to like having bits of paper waved at them and, for that matter, getting them too.
To me the purpose of the exams is to make me a better beekeeper. If I wanted to learn botany in this detail I would study it. There are many things in the examination syllabus that will improve my beekeeping but it seems a minority percentage of things have been added for ? sake.
Whatever the point you see I don't.
I'm sure bits of it probably have been added "for the sake of it" by the people who set the syllabus. If you do module 3 it's made clear that you need to know the scientific names of the conditions. Why you need to know EFB is called melissococcus plutonius is beyond me, but you do. I presume if you study medicine you're required to know what athlete's foot is called too
To me the point of the syllabus and exams is to make me a better educated beekeeper more able to make an informed decision which, in turn, will make me a better beekeeper.
I guess it depends on what you mean by a "better" beekeeper. One of the posters above obviously wants an exam on his way of keeping bees. the syllabus should be geared towards that and the exam exclude any mention of techniques or hives that he deems irrelevant. That's fine, but misses the point of the whole thing I feel. He already knows what's best, so what's the point of taking an exam on the general topic of beekeeping when he already knows his way is best?
How do you define being a better beekeeper?