You may be right if
Chris Slade's review of Dorset's position is anything to go by
I would have like to have seen the emails and notes just before varroa landed on our shores. Quite similar, I am sure!
Sitting on the touchline, I see two issues.
1. the BBKA is meant to be 'the voice of the beekeeper' in the UK. However, only half of the nations beekeepers are members of the BBKA, and possibly a good proportion are disillusioned or 'only there for the insurance'.
2. The BBKA 'does not appear' to be a democratic association, and appears as if the few are providing the voice of the many (whether they like it or not).
As only half of the nations beekeepers are with the BBKA, if they care about the subject, then maybe they should host a referendum and allow non-members to vote.
If EU politics are a problem, then rather than making it a national ruling, maybe they should make it a club ruling which will show they actually care about the subject. This would make them untouchable to EU law, as it is the beekeepers that are voting for how the club should be run.
They would then provide teeth and the genitals to influence other associations to follow suit.
Unfortunately (from the sideline) they appear to have neither.
16. I am shocked they did not know this. I though this was common knowledge. However, it is a really crap response. Just because we have leaky borders, does not mean we should welcome everything in (i.e. just because illegal immigrants make their way in, does not mean we should remove all border control)