- Joined
- Jun 18, 2011
- Messages
- 6,479
- Reaction score
- 392
I'm led to believe, by someone who has copious data, that there is a very marked difference in suvival this year between Poly and Wood hives.
I'm led to believe, by someone who has copious data, that there is a very marked difference in suvival this year between Poly and Wood hives.
In what direction?
This is from a small sample size but this winter I already have 200% higher 'total loss' with poly hives than with cedar hives (all with proven 2011 queens) With no known losses with 2012 queens.
Cedar hives are all top insulated with 25mm of celotex in the roof, solid or polycarbonate crownboards, all on open mesh floors, no matchsticks.
Evidence?taken over large numbers poly had considerably more survivors
. I am not about to publish it as it contains a lot of information of use to competitors.
Edit: or did you mean competition for prime forage sites ?
Back today for first time in a while.
Current losses in polys running at about 18%, but as that includes the ones washed away in the floods its acceptable.
Same system, same environment, broadly similar forage......wooden hives running at over 40% losses with many more to come. ( tiny clusters and will collapse when they start to fly freely.)
All the units NOT exposed to neonics are terrible, way over 60% losses now, but thats down to lesser spring properity last year. All the poly hives worked OSR, so make of that what you will.
..........................
If you wish to go into it, how did the losses present or what was the actual cause of mortality?
Wintering has been normal here and whilst the east winds will obviously affect your part of the world more we probably get on average much more 'confinement weather' every year without these effects.
.......
In both cases poly hives far far lower incidence of the symptoms. Attributing this to the boxes being warmer in winter is, I feel, erroneous.
.........