To keep one amused

[victor meldrew]

Wordle 1,231 3/6

 

[roche]

Wordle 1,231 4/6

 

[cwinte]

Wordle 1,231 3/6* elder
4, max 4
1...


Wordle 1,231 4/6* middler
149, max 6
6, max 6
3, max 6
code luck

Wordle 1,231 3/6* younger
105, max 6
3, max 5
same code luck

 

[victor meldrew]

Wordle 1,232 5/6

 

[roche]

Wordle 1,232 4/6

 

[The Poot]

Looks like I missed yesterday.
Wordle 1,232 6/6






. Phew!

 

[SixFooter]

Wordle 1,232 5/6

 

[cwinte]

Wordle 1,232 3/6* eons
53, max 5
2, max 4
50/50

Wordle 1,232 4/6* ages
114, max 5
25, max 5
1


Wordle 1,232 4/6* months
25, max 4
3, max 4
1


Bot: moderately tough, 4.0 (back from France)

 

[victor meldrew]

Wordle 1,233 4/6

 

[SixFooter]

Wordle 1,233 6/6

 

[The Poot]

Wordle 1,233 4/6

 

[roche]

Wordle 1,233 5/6

 

[cwinte]

Wordle 1,233 4/6* well-aged
107, max 5
3, max 5
2, max 5
odds were mounting

Wordle 1,233 4/6* lightly-aged
97, max 5
18, max 6
7, max 6 (need to check, this proves my line 1 scoring code wrong)
lucky code pick
After my fourth line there could have been 2 other possibles, for a max 6.
My code missed this as a worst case evaluating line 1, yet
..... it was worse than expected worst case of max 5
I have been looking out for cases like this to check my scoring of outcomes works... (or not!)

Wordle 1,233 5/6* youthful vigour
516, max 6
138, max
7, max 5
1...


Bot: really tough, 4.9

 

[SixFooter]

Wordle 1,234 5/6

 

[victor meldrew]

Wordle 1,234 4/6

 

[The Poot]

Oh dear…..
Wordle 1,234 X/6

 

[roche]

Wordle 1,234 6/6

 

[cwinte]

Big delay for a reconsider of the code and a rough cut better version, small testings...
Wordle 1,234 4/6* old'un
235, max 5
10, max 5
1...

not too bad for a first run maybe

Wordle 1,234 5/6* middler
47, max 5
9, max 5 (weird choice using p twice!)
3, max 5
1...


Wordle 1,234 4/6* newbie
189, max 5
7, max 4
1...


Bot: not too bad, 4.1 avg (we seemed to find it tougher)

Poot & Roche both created similar patterns but Roche guessed a bit better at the end!
Not convinced by my mods yet, not enough to try if it predicts a new best starter yet.
I simulated yesterdays game with latest code, it predicted 5 max with a different line 2 and was correct finishing in 5 max (probable 4, if hit 1 of 3 single missing letters after line 2).