Why should you assume that?You've obviously not read my posts on other threads about the likelihood of anyone succeeding in an action against a beekeeper for stings. There has to be negligence on the part of the beek. Keeping bees that sting someone is not negligent per se. It needs the beek to have done something, such as carelessly knocking the hive over with his car. That said, I'm awaiting the details, and the outcome, of the case in Northern Ireland mentioned by Teemore.
I spend my professional life assessing the foreseeability of actions and incidents that have lead to injury. The risk of a hive becoming angered and attacking all in the vicinity is low on the scale, although, as those posters who've suffered have pointed out, it can happen. Site the hive so that the bees' flight path does not cross your or your neighbours' areas of activity. Try to ensure that the bees fly up as soon as they leave the hive. And as RAB says, consider the risk of the hive becoming angry, and have a contingency plan.
Wherever the hive is situated, be it in a garden, on an allotment or in the country, there is always some degree of risk to someone. There were threads earlier this year about hives that were moved to fields of osr attacking passing cyclists and ramblers.
You know your garden and your neighbourhood. You, and the members of the local association, are best placed to make a decision on whether your garden is suitable.
It's precisely the fact that people can/often do get away with their actions ( whatever those actions are ) and these actions are often thrust inconsiderately upon others.
I couldn't live with people being stung all around just because I'm not being negligent. I'd imagine a few swarms depositing themselves ( new beek ) and this can be a pain in the a$$ to some, never mind being stung.
When evaluating, everything must surely point to a quiet place, out of the way.
Yes people can be stung out in the countryside but far less likely than an urban situation.