OP
barneyward
Guest
I would have to respectfully disagree.
I will just disagree. It is a load of codswollop. Up the creek without a paddle.
What you are suggesting is rubbish all ways round.
...sheer crass stupidity on a scientific basis.
Your failings (in your 'method') are obviously two-fold.
1). The assumption that all invert sugar samples have the same water content.
2). The assumption that all partaking contributors already have properly calibrated instruments.
I shall remain polite, despite your views.
The 'obvious' failings in my method are not failings at all.
1) I think it is entirely reasonable to assume that different samples of one manufacturers invert sugar will have a more uniform water content than samples of several different manufacturers' olive oil.
2) I do not assume that all contributors have properly calibrated instruments. That's rather the point - no-one's is likely to be exactly on the mark. However, it is a well accepted statistical technique to take many readings (each with their own inaccuracies) and produce a mean which is a very close approximation to the real value. This is entirely scientific.
I have no idea why you think anyone would deliberately post false results, but it speaks volumes.
I don't want or need a calibration sample that's accurate to umpteen decimal places, or one that lasts for years. I just want a reasonable value from a readily available household product. I believe if enough people submit their own results this is achievable.
Fyi I do not post under any other names on this forum. Is this someone else you have flamed?