May have double posted..apologies if so
Anyway, Chris took one on the nose but apparently I can't post a link because I've not posted enough... So google 'Packham stung on nose'
By the way he took it in a much more stoic fashion than most,
Annoyed about the N rather than sun on graphic...
Adam, I think you came out with credit!
It seemed that the graphic was produced to interpret Martha's voice over referring to North. Overall more might have been made of 'stitching together' the navigating by the sun (uv through clouds and polarisation if there is any blue sky available) and the describing of direction relative to the sun. Perhaps Maggie Couvillon's foraging studies could have been trotted out again in support of "where do they go" rather than pretending to follow them with the hexacopter (nice toy though!)
Nice though the slo-mo was, I thought it could have been much better if much slower. Using the figures given, wings flapping at 240 Hz with a 40x slowdown still leaves 6 wingbeats a second - too fast to appreciate!
Someone needs to explain a bit about bee nutrition to Mr Packham … and the roles of protein and carbs.
Surprised that there wasn't any mention of the floral "nectar guides" changing/disappearing after that flower had been pollinated. Even more magical!
WBCs! Looked like the producers bought the local beekeeper some nice new lifts to go round his boxes! (People with old WBCs seem almost certain to have a mix of frame spacing systems in their brood boxes!) And taking the lifts off would seem like a sensible starting point for infra red photography ...
I'd like to know a whole lot more about the obs hive "swarm". I don't buy the "starvation swarm" explanation. Not with all that local forage. Perhaps absconding from an obs hive with the glass sides left open to the light for way too long?
I thought the best way of studying stuff in an obs hive was using RED light in a darkened room … giving another opportunity to mention the difference in bees' colour perception.
But overall, well done.