Remarkable precision there - 19.2% - not 19.1, or 19.3....... and then this was a survey by an association that boasts about a third of the UK's beekeepers as members - obviously completely accurate then!
If one were a teensie cynical (heaven forfend), one would almost suspect that a certain society had an "interest" in "pushing" back-yard urban beekeeping - wonder if it's a new departure in "branding"....... surely not?
"Bees are suffering from viruses, a parasitic mite and changes in the weather" - obviously thriving on the chemicals - no problem at all there then!