No, not been an issue for my 50 and more Abelo double-broods that have gone through winter for the last few years, and yesterday a clue dawned on me: when I put a colony back together, the box rims get a quick scrape.
Consequence of cleaning rims is that gaps between boxes do not occur and water does not enter. Movement of boxes? Not an issue either, because after bees have been in new kit a few days and laid propolis in between the boxes, a scrape with a hive tool (takes 8 scrapes and about 10 seconds a box) removes the bulk, and trace propolis is enough to prevent movement.
Beekeepers use techniques of wild variation but a common desire (esp. for those with a commercial motive) is to take a hive apart and back again as fast as possible. This is all well and good, but it brings to mind the subtle difference between
fast and
quick, a definition understood by the late and very great pianist
Jerry Lee Lewis: it's easy to play fast, but far greater skill and technique is required to play
quick, and he knew he was quick, not fast.
We've all seen the videos of tyro beefarmers chucking boxes about as if they held grapefruit, and the indifference necessary to close the eyes to what Ian decribed earlier as
carnage. Well, they may get the medal for speed when they put it back together, but are probably unaware or indifferent to the alternative efficiency gained from finer points of box management. Squash 19 bees when bunging back a box? Rain will get in.
If my aim is to work quickly and if I want to be in and out of a hive in 5 minutes, the kit must be common and the parts must work cleanly together.
Thus suggestion just ain't going to work for me. For a start, the Abelo 12-frame system is based on a 490mm footprint and not the 460mm National 11-frame footprint, and strategies to deal with this anomaly (and the top beespace of one system and bottom beespace of the other) came up in an earlier thread
Using standard supers with Abelo 12-frame poly (top bee space) in which beginner confusion and headscratching tried to resolve the intractable.
Perhaps it is possible to fiddle about and make it work, but that's time and effort wasted unnecessarily for the lack of uniformity, and the purpose of this thread is to point out the differences and enable beekeepers (esp. beginners) to reach a decision.
Me too, but the idea that one extra frame is going to make material difference to colony or beekeeper efficiency really has no merit and is mere tiddling. How long is one frame going to serve a strong colony in April? Not a lot, and my answer would be to give another box, and then another, and not expect one frame to make any difference at all.
I agree, and so give opinion based on experience, but the ominous suggestion that opinions
should not serve to influence fellow beekeepers is curious, as it appears to seek to suppress the very purpose of this forum: to exchange opinion and experience.
Long gone are the days when commonality across industries was seen as useful. The original BS National standards were laid down during the Second World War when commonality of purpose was part of British culture, and beekeeping manufacturers (history, please, to confirm) would have worked together, or at least seen the advantage of selling a standard product
These days our habits are guided by the Fiat 500, dominated by a culture of individualisation and consumerism. Fiat 500? Last I looked, the customer could indulge itself in more than a thousand interior trim combinations, but while such variety would have no impact on the function of the vehicle architecture, it is self-evident that different designs of beehive will affect compatibility & management efficiency and production & retail cost.
Perhaps JBM makes a good point, and the tail has begun to wag the dog?