But the bee space is on both sides....lowering manufacturing costs.
But the bee space is on both sides....lowering manufacturing costs.
I take above comment back..They are no longer glued.Yes - that does appear a superior product but its 40% more expensive.
These ones do just fine. The beespace is a non issue as they tend not to build brace comb as its so close to beespace.
If they fail at the joint after a few years, ill just glue them back and stick a few brads in. These are glued corners btw. Just glued and pinned as opposed to lapped.
I have a couple of lap jointed ones that have failed at the joints.
Ah good to hear some first hand assessment of them.Saw these QX's with them last year at the tradex - Poorly built in general was my assesment so I plumped to top up with the Maisies ones
For what its worth I've had QX's from C. Wynne Jones, Thorne and Abelo. I'd rank them in that order as well and I had to return the Abelo ones they were that flimsy.
The reason I use wire framed is I use the swienty feeder so need something with a bee space to work with.I use the paynes plastic ones with zero issues. Can't see the point in paying more than the £4 they are in the sales.
I use the paynes plastic ones with zero issues. Can't see the point in paying more than the £4 they are in the sales.
£4 for the plastic against £14 for the proper Lega framed QX is very difficult to argue with, but having used both, I reckon it's the expensive one that saves time and energy in the field: the plastic QX ends up with enough brace comb below and brace comb above (and the inevitable bees crushed when replacing) that everything needs either scraping off, or scraping top bars and putting on another clean QX.
Did they have full bee space either side?I've recently donated my framed wire QX's to a friend because I found them a pain with brace comb and squashing bees! Strange how we all have different experiences.
I much prefer galvanised sheet ones or plastic ones. Each to there own eh?
Enter your email address to join: