Yawn! 2 more random and irrelevant links. Guardian article not even taking about absolute water extraction levels - just bemoans the fact that 86% of extraction comes from a small numbers of organisations.
Second article just states water extraction influences climate change - well woo-pee-do. I can cite a study tells us blackberry juice is red - about as relevant. Karol, just tell us yourself, the links add nothing you know. Do you honestly think the number of citations matters more than the quality - it’s just so time consuming; but every time you post an irrelevant one you just loose a bit more credibility. In medical school we used to call it ‘donning priestly robes’ - it’s a fraud.
Over and out.