Beekeepers talk among themselves. One NZ beekeeper frequents the U.S. beesource forum as "oldtimer". He has posted a few times about getting queens to evaluate from the guy who lost almost all of his bees. It will be a year or two before anyone publicly says if the queens are resistant.
I do not trust on individual beekeepers, who says that he has need mite resistant hives. Hobby beekeepers get in few years resistant bees and with professionals it takes decades.
Next questions are
- why others do not use his bees .... Even after years
- do the bees get good yields
- when bees however have pest on neck, and suck blood, colonies suffer and their production is poor
- how bad those bees are to sting.
If you get 100% more honey with treatments, why don't you use then ordinary bees.
IT is like farming, do you use herbicides or not...
500$ per mated Queen every second year.... Grazy price instead of mite treatment. Mad!
You get 2 new hives with that queen price if mite kills one. And huge loose the Queen, which is 500$.
If you have under 20 hives, you are not able to maintain and save your own genepool inside mongrel colonies. With rigid selecting you have soon inbreeding problems. Sooner than mite resistant bees.
.
.