The hope is that OAV has a prolonged effect which catches new mites that emerge.
What if the prolonged 'drop' is simply due to a staggered death of the original phoretic mites?
I along with others hope that repeated OAV works. It's worrying that some of those monitoring mite levels don't seem to be seeing mites dropping below sub economic thresholds.
Sorry but what is " sub economic thresholds."?
I assume you mean the natural drop level of 2-3 /day.
If so, apples and pears.
Without treating you may see any level of natural drop - and a hive may be very badly infested and the mite drop still be low. It is notoriously wrong as an indicator.
If you are using OA vaping - efficiency up to 97% let's say 80% as an example = and you have 100 phoretic mites in the hive and 40 mites a day emerging from brood cells a day - then the mite fall would look like this:
(NOTE: t
his is an example only)
Start of day 1
Phoretic mites: 100
Drop :80% =80
Mites left = 20 + emerging 40 =60
Start of day 2.
Phoretic mites: 60
Drop :80% =48
Mites left = 12 + emerging 40 =52
Start of Day 3
Phoretic mites: 52
Drop :80% =42
Mites left = 10 + emerging 40 =50
Start of Day 4
Phoretic mites: 50
Drop :80% =40
Mites left = 10 + emerging 40 =50
And so on.
As a badly infested hive will have LOTS of mites within the brood cells, you can treat a hive with brood for weeks before you will see any huge fall. That will happen when the phoretic mites start declining in numbers and the mites entering brood cells fall.
Capped brood takes 12 days to emerge. Varroa mites enter just before capping..
So for 12 days from treatment start , you will see NO reductions in mite fall from emerging brood..
Some time or other, I'll set up a spreadsheet to play with the numbers..
I see lots of dead immature mites on my hive with bad infestation..