To keep one amused

[victor meldrew]

Wordle 835 5/6

 

[SixFooter]

Wordle 835 4/6

 

[The Poot]

Wordle 835 6/6








Only just crept in again. Not doing great lately.

 

[roche]

Wordle 835 5/6

 

[cwinte]

Wordle 835 5/6* old
651
34
5
just 1


Wordle 835 4/6* new
181 worst case 5
17
2, 50/50... (test word was close, worst case left 4 possibles and the max 5)

scoring method code changed so a bit of a reset for trying out both strategies. Early days...

 

[victor meldrew]

Wordle 836 4/6

 

[SixFooter]

Wordle 836 3/6

 

[roche]

Wordle 836 4/6

 

[cwinte]

Wordle 836 4/6* old
21
2
lost the 50/50


Wordle 836 4/6* new
23, max 4
2more possible (good reduction from the 6 words with this last 3)
lost 50/50 (again, being fair)

 

[The Poot]

Wordle 836 4/6

 

[SixFooter]

Wordle 837 3/6

 

[victor meldrew]

Wordle 837 4/6

 

[roche]

Wordle 837 4/6

 

[The Poot]

Wordle 837 5/6







Success ….eventually

 

[cwinte]

Wordle 837 2/6* old
just 5, when you try rarer letters and get some...
3 words would ensure a max 3, I chose the most PC although they should all come up sometime!

Wordle 837 4/6* new
128
4 possibles, 2 of them make 4 sure
1 final ... then

 

[victor meldrew]

Wordle 838 2/6

 

[SixFooter]

Wordle 838 5/6

 

[roche]

Too many options!
Wordle 838 6/6

 

[cwinte]

Wordle 838 2/6* old
7 possible, 4 of them give max 4
just a lucky 1 in 4

Wordle 838 3/6* new
31
as suggested but shows weak coding, 5 possibles are a group (like Roche above) so worst case 7/X
was the alphabetic first so given by code, also I know it was the answer
The New method showed badly here but I blame my latest code revisions, a large untested revamp to handle double letters correctly.

 

[victor meldrew]

Too many options!
Wordle 838 6/6

Pure luck , I won a 4 to 1 bet !