- Joined
- Mar 31, 2019
- Messages
- 848
- Reaction score
- 368
- Location
- South Yorkshire
- Hive Type
- TBH
- Number of Hives
- 3
If the second (upper) brood box is empty should it be removed for the winter - to avoid isolation starvation?
Yes - obviously not neededIf the second (upper) brood box is empty should it be removed for the winter - to avoid isolation starvation?
You could remove and carefully store the empty drawn super now, and remove to queen excluder.Thank you for your detailed answer. 1am?! I have inspected every week from the start but I did not realise that the queen was running out of laying space. I am specifically looking out for that now. There is nothing in the super although mostly drawn. I can preserve that for next year. When I added the second brood box I put two frames with capped brood taken from the bottom in it. Those frames plus 2 are now ‘solid’ honey and there has never been any new brood in the upper box. (The excluder is above it.) Unless someone advises otherwise I was going to leave that as their supply for the winter. It’s OK for this year but I would hope for another year I can get the set up right to have a surplus.
Understood thank you.You could remove and carefully store the empty drawn super now, and remove to queen excluder.
You can leave those 4 frames for a winter feed. Read up about hefting the boxes as you may need to give additional feed later.
The first year /season of a hive is really all about getting enough drawn comb and enough bees to survive the coming winter. The following season is when you might expect a surplus.
Personally I use both Buckfast and Carni, different temperaments dependent on the source they have a different attributes.I don’t consider buying in a new queen now and again a waste of time at all. How else can you get to play with different bees?
If you are talking about a second brood box my suggestion would be to leave it on, feed heavily, try to fill the top box with usable invert syrups before the end of summer/Autumn, the bees will normally travel to one side of the bottom box then up into the top box for winter almost no need to inspect. they will have all the usable stores they need.If the second (upper) brood box is empty should it be removed for the winter - to avoid isolation starvation?
If you are talking about a second brood box my suggestion would be to leave it on, feed heavily, try to fill the top box with usable invert syrups before the end of summer/Autumn
I don’t consider buying in a new queen now and again a waste of time at all. How else can you get to play with different bees?
Reading stories of generational defensiveness is one thing, but from what I've heard and experienced in my area decline in temper is not the beast it's painted. For example, a beekeeper I know now running twenty or thirty started with (and uses exclusively) Ged Marshall Buckfast, and it wasn't until he got to the eighth or ninth generation that they began to get a little frisky (by his BF standards of docility).If you are going to go down the bought in breeds route make sure you do a bit of reading about F1/Gen2nd/3rd hybrid vigour (which can result in very marked aggression) first. If you've got used to lovely gentle Buckfasts as a beginner this could be quite a shock.
It was a figure of speechBees are not playthings either.
a beekeeper I know now running twenty or thirty started with (and uses exclusively) Ged Marshall Buckfast, and it wasn't until he got to the eighth or ninth generation that they began to get a little frisky (by his BF standards of docility).
Would different bees not increase the gene pool and prevent in breeding?Precisely the reason I said I would never advise new beekeepers to do it. Beginners are more likely to lose swarms and queens cost money.
I have my views on imported bees and queens ( but this thread is not the place ) however the constant introduction of different types creates and perpetuates the 'stingy mongrels' that beekeepers criticise.
Would different bees not increase the gene pool and prevent in breeding?
I am putting my head above the parapet here as I have heard that some areas of Scotland are forbidding their membership from buying anything other than the black bee.From what I have read, some of the bigger operations for queen production anything but a varied gene-pool. By definition, if they are breeding pure "races" or types of bees then they are in-breeding.
I think it's to do with the 'pure' breeds having reduced genetic variability. A bit like some purebred dog pedigrees this results in some predictable traits such as behaviour. But then these pure breeds do mix with other breeds resulting in a vigorous mongrel - this vigor, in bees, can be expressed as aggression (along with possibly useful traits such as increased productivity and potentially disease resistance). Someone will point out that Buckfasts are not pure bred - but the same outcome is reported by many.Would different bees not increase the gene pool and prevent in breeding?
What I have done is that last year I requeened my 2 of my 6 colonies ( now 5 as I gave one away to a friend) with Carnolian bees, as the requeened colonies were vicious little gits and locally bred.
This year I requeened the other 3, with 2 Buckfast and 1 Carnolian.
So far I only have one hive that has lately started to be ratty,
Enter your email address to join: