When one material was the only option it made the decision easy.
Average yields cannot be attributed automatically to wood but more than likely to beekeeper skill, mammoth flows way back when land was unspoiled, or a colonies' ability to overcome the thermal deficiencies of wood.
The conclusion of Murray McGregor beats all else, because running 5000+ in a mixture of wood and poly gives real-world numbers. In this case, yields 15% higher in poly is the take-home figure. All the rest is emotive semantics - who loves wood more, which dimension outranks that, mere pub talk variables.
Use whichever material fulfils the criteria of material, production and thermal efficiency, put it to work and above all, make it last.