To close out my contribution to this discussion of OAV.. ..
Firstly, it never hurts to remind ourselves of the science and for this I find Randy Oliver's site (and linked PPT) useful:
https://scientificbeekeeping.com/oxalic-acid-heat-vaporization-and-other-methods-part-2-of-2-parts/
Of particular interest: OA sublimes at 189 Celsius from which it may be inferred that recrystallisation into a fog of airborne crystals, within the hive or outside it, is virtually instantaneous, regardless of season. Provide a cold surface immediately adjacent to the pan, as in vaporising beneath the mesh floor, and you'll inevitably reduce the dose reaching the bees, as I proved to myself again yesterday (I didn't measure the dosage loss because I don't have a suitable field weighing scale).
Why would you wittingly dose at less than the recommended level? Well, most of us probably wouldn't, and therein lies another interesting fact: the graph on Randy's page seems to indicate that OAV is equally effective at half and full recommended dose. This likely explains why, in practice, it's good enough to vape from beneath the mesh floor. It's certainly easier, operationally, do do that than (as in my case) levering-out a tight entrance block! That said, I won't be treating from beneath the mesh floor again.
And finally, I find it fascinating that such a high airborne load of OA is not toxic to the bees. Again, from the image on Randy's page, it's apparent that the bees tolerate OA depositing directly on the hairs that cover parts of their bodies. The physiological component of that tolerance is certainly a genetic trait, which I would guess is far surpassed during OA vaporisation - after all, it's pure OA crystals that collects on the bees. Note, in the same article, the implied limited tolerance to OA ingestion in sugar solution.
So how do we account for the apparent "excess OA tolerance" in vapour form, which surely exceed levels normally encountered in the natural environment? I wonder if it's down to the bee's spiracles (breathing holes) being smaller than most of the airborne OA crystals? Any research articles on this?