- Joined
- Sep 4, 2011
- Messages
- 5,993
- Reaction score
- 5,614
- Location
- Wiveliscombe
- Hive Type
- National
- Number of Hives
- 24
Not!
I think I posted a while back about our neighbour who pulled out of a field on his quad bike into the side of my wife's car and subsequently accused us of fraud... I was "doorstepped" by him again today. This time he accused me of illegally cutting his hedge. There's a patchy hedge alongside our drive, entirely on our land, where (I assume) birds have sat on a fence and spread stones from sloes that have since germinated. The Calor Gas delivery man decided it was overgrown and refused to deliver, so a couple of weeks ago I laid it all. It doesn't look too bad considering it was my first ever attempt. Certainly it could be a lot worse. Anyhow, according to my neighbour this hedge doesn't belong to me because when he sold off the land that forms our property he retained ownership of the hedges and fences that were easy to maintain. Never mind that this "hedge" didn't even exist at the time of the sale. He also claimed that the trees that have since been planted along our side of the fence also form part of his hedge, even if they're just solitary trees. And the boundary hedge between his field and my veggie plot is also his, because he wouldn't cut it with his flail otherwise. The fact that his claims defied any kind of logic really didn't seem to matter to him.
Well, I checked the deeds for the original sale this evening (they were returned to me by the bank or whoever was keeping them because when we bought the place everything had gone electronic). It doesn't mention anything about hedges. It just says that he owns the fence that forms the boundary. The one he cuts with a flail actually belongs to us. So if anything, he's the one who is guilty of doing what he has accused me of.
I knew something was up when I saw him taking photos around the edges of his field last weekend, but I am slightly relieved to find out what, and that it shouldn't present me with too many problems. It is tempting to wait until next winter and lay lots more just to see what happens though. What's really bizarre is that I know he possesses a copy of the deeds (because I've seen him referring to them in the past), so he could actually check the details for himself. But instead he invents some new version of reality to suit himself and then attempts to browbeat and threaten everyone else into accepting that he is right.
James
I think I posted a while back about our neighbour who pulled out of a field on his quad bike into the side of my wife's car and subsequently accused us of fraud... I was "doorstepped" by him again today. This time he accused me of illegally cutting his hedge. There's a patchy hedge alongside our drive, entirely on our land, where (I assume) birds have sat on a fence and spread stones from sloes that have since germinated. The Calor Gas delivery man decided it was overgrown and refused to deliver, so a couple of weeks ago I laid it all. It doesn't look too bad considering it was my first ever attempt. Certainly it could be a lot worse. Anyhow, according to my neighbour this hedge doesn't belong to me because when he sold off the land that forms our property he retained ownership of the hedges and fences that were easy to maintain. Never mind that this "hedge" didn't even exist at the time of the sale. He also claimed that the trees that have since been planted along our side of the fence also form part of his hedge, even if they're just solitary trees. And the boundary hedge between his field and my veggie plot is also his, because he wouldn't cut it with his flail otherwise. The fact that his claims defied any kind of logic really didn't seem to matter to him.
Well, I checked the deeds for the original sale this evening (they were returned to me by the bank or whoever was keeping them because when we bought the place everything had gone electronic). It doesn't mention anything about hedges. It just says that he owns the fence that forms the boundary. The one he cuts with a flail actually belongs to us. So if anything, he's the one who is guilty of doing what he has accused me of.
I knew something was up when I saw him taking photos around the edges of his field last weekend, but I am slightly relieved to find out what, and that it shouldn't present me with too many problems. It is tempting to wait until next winter and lay lots more just to see what happens though. What's really bizarre is that I know he possesses a copy of the deeds (because I've seen him referring to them in the past), so he could actually check the details for himself. But instead he invents some new version of reality to suit himself and then attempts to browbeat and threaten everyone else into accepting that he is right.
James