If you believe that mobile 'phone masts are dangerous to bees, then you ban all mobile 'phones from anywhere near the hives........
here's a cut an paste of "why" from a previous discussion about the subject -
- transmission "falls off" as the square of distance, and that the mobile phone mast is using very little more power than a 'phone, we get the following - say the top of the mast is 30 feet away, that equals 360 inches, the square of which is - 129,000 - so the power from that mast at 30 feet is probably one one hundred and thirty-thousandth....... of that which you'd receive using a mobile phone if they were outputting the same power-...
"if you take the fact that the average 'phone mast is emitting a whole 20 watts, and a mobile 'phone may be emitting 2 watts (typical figures), there is a factor of 10 between them - using my example, simply divide 130,000 by ten (to give 13,000) - so if a mobile 'phone mast is dangerous at 30 feet, a mobile 'phone is 13,000 times more dangerous at an inch (from your brain)............ and everyone worries about the mast, few about the 'phones.....
As "fall out" from these sums, if we really believe the radiation from mobiles to be dangerous (and I really don't dismiss the possibility for really close-up use), then we should be campaigning for MORE 'phone masts.......
Mobile 'phones vary their power, according to how far they are from the mast - in a strong reception area, with a mast nearby, it will only be using a few milliwatts, whereas if it is a distant mast, it'll ramp up to a full 2 watts or thereabouts - if you look at the maths, it's the really close use/power where it is most likely to be dangerous, hence we really should be campaigning for MORE masts..........
(I don't want it to be true either, but you can't alter physics or maths....)