Finman
Queen Bee
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2008
- Messages
- 27,887
- Reaction score
- 2,026
- Location
- Finland, Helsinki
- Hive Type
- Langstroth
Dr. R. W. Currie
Department of Entomology
University of Manitoba
Winnipeg,
Date Approved:
March 26, 2001
Project Status:
Completed September, 2003
Results and Discussion:
Dose-Time Exposure Relationship
Our results showed that the efficacy of formic acid is a function of the combination of dose and exposure time to which an individual hive is exposed. This combination of dose and exposure time is referred to as the concentration x time product (CT product). When the correct CT product was reached efficacy was greater than 95%. However, there was considerable variability in the actual dose each hive received even though the formic acid was evenly distributed throughout the air in the fumigation rooms. Concentrations of formic acid with the hive air are considerably lower than in the room in which they are housed. Hive air equilibrated with room air after a period of time that took anywhere from several days to several weeks depending upon the acid dose and hive characteristics. Colonies adsorbed formic acid and degassed the acid that had been adsorbed for several days after fumigation had ceased.
Both high and low dose treatments formic provided effective control of varroa mites in wintering facilities. However, when low-doses were utilized long exposure times were necessary to achieve acceptable levels of control. The advantage of low-dose treatments was that no queen loss was observed at exposure periods up to 47 days. Our high dose treatments did not cause excessive worker bee mortality when applied for periods of up to 9 days but excessive queen loss was observed when ventilation was not regulated. The best treatment strategy to maximize varroa mite mortality and minimize queen loss in our experiments was the low-dose long*exposure treatment.
Department of Entomology
University of Manitoba
Winnipeg,
Date Approved:
March 26, 2001
Project Status:
Completed September, 2003
Results and Discussion:
Dose-Time Exposure Relationship
Our results showed that the efficacy of formic acid is a function of the combination of dose and exposure time to which an individual hive is exposed. This combination of dose and exposure time is referred to as the concentration x time product (CT product). When the correct CT product was reached efficacy was greater than 95%. However, there was considerable variability in the actual dose each hive received even though the formic acid was evenly distributed throughout the air in the fumigation rooms. Concentrations of formic acid with the hive air are considerably lower than in the room in which they are housed. Hive air equilibrated with room air after a period of time that took anywhere from several days to several weeks depending upon the acid dose and hive characteristics. Colonies adsorbed formic acid and degassed the acid that had been adsorbed for several days after fumigation had ceased.
Both high and low dose treatments formic provided effective control of varroa mites in wintering facilities. However, when low-doses were utilized long exposure times were necessary to achieve acceptable levels of control. The advantage of low-dose treatments was that no queen loss was observed at exposure periods up to 47 days. Our high dose treatments did not cause excessive worker bee mortality when applied for periods of up to 9 days but excessive queen loss was observed when ventilation was not regulated. The best treatment strategy to maximize varroa mite mortality and minimize queen loss in our experiments was the low-dose long*exposure treatment.