Sadly ours often isn't better quality than a mobile (where one works) because the lines have been hit by lightning or hedging flails or whatever so many times. Almost every set of poles between us and the exchange has it's own section of cable that has been patched in to repair a fault
Every time they actually have to replace several short sections with a longer run we get a slightly faster ADSL connection speed. I'm wondering if we'll make it to 5Mb/s before everything goes digital. I do take your point though. I'm not aware of what the plan is in terms of providing sufficient power for an emergency services telephone call in the event of a power cut for example. Hopefully there is one. Or what happens if the current phone line enters the house nowhere convenient for a power socket, come to think of it.
I can't see minds being changed however. As far as the suppliers are concerned it seems their view is "more bandwidth = more income", and the couch potatoes are ever more desperate for greater definition for their vacuous televisual brain rotting. Come to think of it, once everyone has enough bandwidth to stream sufficient television programmes to cause their entire central nervous system to regress to that of an earthworm, I'd not be surprised if broadcast terrestrial television is discontinued in favour of using the bandwidth for more wireless services.
Nor do I think you'll get (much of) a choice about "hanging on" to your POTS line. I'd guess at some point we'll all get a letter along the lines of "On <today+six months> we'll be turning off your analogue phone service. You have to make an appointment to be switched over to the shiny new digital system by that time or your phone line will cease working". Not sure quite how that fits with the USO, but perhaps if you're failing to take an action that is required to connect to a service that is available, it'll probably be viewed as your problem.
James