Was there a purpose other than curiosity?
Nope, not really. Basically I had no idea what was going on in my hives and I wanted to find out how, just after the varroa treatment. I had no idea that it would be wrong to do it. Yes, it is October, but it is a very mild October.
The main reason I'm told I should not do this is because the queen is sluggish and may not be able to scurry off in good time, so you risk killing her or losing her. Anyway, it's a good thing I inspected the Klarenbeek hives because I would have thought (after feeding them for a month) that they should be fully fed by now, but... they need another 10 kg of sugar each.
I can understand it during the inspection season - indeed, I take photos of my frames as I inspect them but ... at this point in the season?
I suspect that if I hadn't been able to secure a fellow beekeeper yesterday to take photos, I would not have taken photos of every frame -- I probably would not have inspected the entire hives. But since I was able to get pictures of all frames in one apiary, it struck me as an opportunity to do the same for the other apiaries as well.
Also, the experienced beeks initially didn't criticise my decision to take photos at the first apiary, but instead gave helpful advice based on the photos. I suppose I thought that this is a good opportunity to get some helpful advice on the other hives as well. It was only when they realised that I had taken the cue and photographed the other hives as well that they changed their tune and reprimanded me for the inspections instead of giving more advice.
Anyway, I'm satisfied with the results. I learnt a lot in these two days.
Say, what would your reason be for saying that this action is stupid?