- Joined
- Oct 23, 2017
- Messages
- 977
- Reaction score
- 849
- Location
- Nr. Bury St Edmunds, UK
- Hive Type
- Other
- Number of Hives
- 6 Rose Hives
Thanks JBMOlszewski , K. (2007) Winter-hardiness of Buckfast bees under specific weather conditions of areas with alternating influences of maritime and continental climate. Journal of Apicultural Science 51(1), 73-82 2007
Olszewski reported winter food consumption [in kilograms] per colony between 1 November and 21
March (141 days) in Poland by Buckfast and Norwegian x Caucasian bees exposed to different
overwintering methods (data from 2004 and 2005 winter were pooled together). Data from his Table 4 are
shown here:
Taking the average of the breeds, the consumption rates were 0.076 kg/day for uninsulated hives and 0.062
Overwintering
method Buckfast Norwegian x Caucasian Mean CV Mean CVUninsulated 11.72 3.01 9.7 15.03Insulated 9.72 17.63 7.8 25.59
kg/day for insulated hives. In the study period, minimum temperatures ranged from +1 to -7°C. From the
maximum and minimum temperatures given for November to February the average was calculated as
0.43°C.
Unfortunately the Table is corrupted and gives erroneous data. Here is an image from the paper
This study was to compare the overwintering of Buckfast bees with Norwegian/Caucasion cross bees in East Poland. It does indicate that bees the kept in insulated hives used fewer stores than the same bees in uninsulated hives in that climate. Very good.
However my assertion was that clustered bees use fewer stores than active bees (in a winter situation). I don't think this paper helps with that.
I would like to drop this now.