There are heroes and then there's the volunteers at BD Clean:
https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&s...oQFnoECBIQAQ&usg=AOvVaw3-qDXWY2TseSjjXAUYBGD_
https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&s...oQFnoECBIQAQ&usg=AOvVaw3-qDXWY2TseSjjXAUYBGD_
Every piece of that tossed away somewhere upstream. We had a KEEP BRITAIN TIDY campaign a while ago. (Actually we're overdue another one) But Bangladesh certainly needs one (and keep it running).There are heroes and then there's the volunteers at BD Clean:
https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3jC2s-8kSo&vl=en&ved=2ahUKEwjayrKwh4WLAxUQTkEAHf74EWoQFnoECBIQAQ&usg=AOvVaw3-qDXWY2TseSjjXAUYBGD_
Possibly, as for the keep Britain tidy, it needs to be a mentality and one that comes from the top which is most definitely not the case now. There is no pride, period, in our dear leaders. All we have is agendas and greed. Latest gov reaction from Rachel of Thieves in regards water companies and pollution a perfect example.Every piece of that tossed away somewhere upstream. We had a KEEP BRITAIN TIDY campaign a while ago. (Actually we're overdue another one) But Bangladesh certainly needs one (and keep it running).
Possibly, as for the keep Britain tidy, it needs to be a mentality and one that comes from the top which is most definitely not the case now. There is no pride, period, in our dear leaders. All we have is agendas and greed. Latest gov reaction from Rachel of Thieves in regards water companies and pollution a perfect example.
It is clear to me that the number 1 problem in our climate and environment is pollution not co2, there is no money or profit in cleaning up the world only cost whereas the totally fraudulent net zero nonsense is profitable beyond imagining. Unfortunately those supporting the nonsense probably do so in the belief it will lead to a cleaner environment. Our water Co's and the governments lack of enforcing rules is but one very good example of my position. People need to separate the two issues in their minds at which point they will realize they are being cheated by very clever frauds.During my professional life I was aware of the amount of discarded feed and pest control chemical containers in the rural and upland countryside. You might be surprised at how much. Part of the “litter” issue?
Maybe governments are most of the problem. I heard an observation that Westminster governments are not always interested in projects that will not be pretty well completed before the next GE. However, other grandiose projects which may take longer can be started in the knowledge that if they are white elephants it is likely that they won't be re-elected and have to face the music. It's all playing to the gallery.It is clear to me that the number 1 problem in our climate and environment is pollution not co2, there is no money or profit in cleaning up the world only cost whereas the totally fraudulent net zero nonsense is profitable beyond imagining. Unfortunately those supporting the nonsense probably do so in the belief it will lead to a cleaner environment. Our water Co's and the governments lack of enforcing rules is but one very good example of my position. People need to separate the two issues in their minds at which point they will realize they are being cheated by very clever frauds.
There are some public services which should have remained in public ownership because of the national interest. Inefficiency was rife but real management talent could have dealt with that. Water, Sewage, Health, Fuel and Power are things which are essential to life. Health unfortunately has too much vulnerability to exploitation but I can't offhand suggest how to avoid this. Secondary services such as travel are important but in themselves create a self perpetuating raison d etre. "Convenient" trains encourage living at a distance from employment whereas in earlier years towns and villages local to jobs were the norm. No travel costs. No clogged roads etc. It's not an easy situation to resolve.Maybe governments are most of the problem. I heard an observation that Westminster governments are not always interested in projects that will not be pretty well completed before the next GE. However, other grandiose projects which may take longer can be started in the knowledge that if they are white elephants it is likely that they won't be re-elected and have to face the music. It's all playing to the gallery.
Pollution is certainly a massive issue, but after privatising water governments have failed to protect customers and the public, instead they allow foreign "investors" the freedom to run up huge debts often to pay out dividends to themselves. Not a lot of priority for investing in infrastructure [especially evident with Thames and Southern - oh is it coincidence that many of the same faces have been meddling with both?]