alanf
Queen Bee
- Joined
- May 26, 2011
- Messages
- 2,185
- Reaction score
- 1
- Location
- Middx
- Hive Type
- National
- Number of Hives
- 2
Not questioning experience. I'm trying to work out the practicalities that have led to II being widely written about but very little about AF. I guess it depends on what the aim of your breeding is.Yes Alan,this is simply to fertilise an infertile drone egg with one sperm,and then use the larvae to raise a queen from,and not to inseminate or otherwise mate a virgin queen.The queen produced from the larvae still has to then be mated,either naturally or by II. Hope that helps to explain.
If your intention is only to maintain a blood line you can do it solely through artificial fertilization. You control the parents of each queen, that does the job without having to get the queen on the bench again. Mating those queens randomly isn't a problem for the genetic purity because the offspring will be non breeding workers.
If you want the genetics to be be expressed productively thoughout all your colonies you have to control the worker genetics through II or other restrictions on mating. But that won't have any influence on the next generation if you use AF. Producing queens for sale, I can see why controlled mating is an advantage. II does use a dozen or more drones but if these are from the same hive is there any real advantage using a single drone with AF?
Random mating may be riskier than II in experienced hands if the concern is losing a queen. It's unlikely to be higher risk than mating at an isolated site. Is the main reason II is more prominent is that once II is mastered for productive queens, AF doesn't add much practical advantage?