From your point of view, is that we=you or we=I?
It's just that you said "I think", but "we should write" and "we should have an idea first . . ."
I am presuming that you are meaning that you would be happy to write to the Editor to correct the error, if others can verify the facts for you. It doesn't need to be a group effort writing.
I think someone suggested that Gavin would know. A PM might be a good idea, as I'm sure that it is a subject close to his heart, if not his sporran.
Some will doubtless think me being picky, but I'm not, I just like a bit of clarity in my life and what started as a good idea, "I think . . ." quickly lost focus.
I don't get BeeCraft, so I am not in a position to do anything and wouldn't want to steal your thunder anyhow. I agree with you whole heartedly that the factual errors or omissions in the article could have unfortunate ramifications.
Are you happy to be elected?