No, not making it up at all. It was one of the stupid questions taken directly from a past paper. Not sure of the level - could even have been a ‘master beekeeper’ type level. They are probably still asking how to properly use matchsticks under the crownboard, for all I know!
In most exams you don’t get marks if you can’t understand the question and give a completely wrong answer on another topic (although there are exceptions, when examining boards have realised that the question was ambiguous or too easily mistaken). I know it happened in a Biology A level paper in 1967. I answered correctly, but likely 80% or more gave a different response when meiosis and mitosis were mixed up by many examinees.
I once had a question which, while referring to a 1MW wind turbine, asked how much power it would supply if one doubled the rotor diameter. The correct answer is not 4MW. The question may have been ‘how much would the power increase?’ - I can’t remember, but the answer to that question would not be 3MW, either.